The FCA released a new review identifying transparency issues among CFD brokers, including unclear overnight charges and poor Consumer Duty implementation. Several mid-sized firms still fail to meet fair-value standards. The findings signal tougher supervision and potential enforcement actions across the UK CFD sector.
Wikilix Editorial Team
Author

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced the findings of a recent review of CFD providers across several firms, which raise serious concerns about pricing, overnight funding charges, and the fairness of valuation. The review may affect UK forex/CFD brokers.
The FCA published its findings of a multi-firm review into how CFD providers are delivering price and value to retail clients on 13 November 2025. In summary, the review found:
• Some firms are applying inconsistent or insufficiently disclosed overnight funding charges and spreads.
• Many mid to small-sized firms have not yet adapted to the FCA's "Consumer Duty" requirements, specifically in relation to their fair value assessments and handling vulnerable clients.
• The FCA is engaging with firms identified as needing improvement and may consider further monitoring/enforcement action for non-compliance.
• For brokers providing forex/CFD products with FCA authorisation, it further demonstrates the FCA's consideration of pricing, fees, and client outcomes, now subject to further scrutiny.
• Brokers unable to place historical fee structures in line with Consumer Duty requirements will be subject to potential enforcement action, reputational damage, or withdrawal of FCA authorisation.
• For traders, this serves as yet another reminder to conduct comparisons of brokers' fee structures, transparency on overnight funding charges, and verification of the broker's regulatory compliance with the UK's retail protections.
• The Consumer Duty regime is no longer just a compliance checkbox but is now a key competitive differentiator for brokers in the UK. Brokers who can demonstrate not just a clear, fair value outcome for clients, but also continuously audit/monitor them, stand to be best placed.
• Brokers who continue to treat fee structures as murky, particularly on overnight funding, will risk being flagged and/or sanctioned. For brokers that are not based in the UK but allow access to UK clients via branches or EU/UK passports, this may also require a review of their access to UK clients.
• The content on WikiLix strengthens a rating criterion we are implementing: fee transparency - aligned with Consumer Duty. Brokers that score poorly should be flagged for higher risk on our watchlist.
What do you think about this article?

EBC Financial gained FSCA approval in South Africa, giving it a rare onshore licence and a stronger market position. The move highlights Africa’s growing role and the importance of onshore regulation for trader safety.

ASIC has taken action against Learn to Trade for failing to submit mandatory financial reports for two years. The company must now appoint an independent expert to review its compliance procedures. This reflects increasing regulatory scrutiny on education and marketing entities linked to forex and CFD brokers.

JNFX Ltd has entered special administration following operational restrictions and financial concerns. Joint special administrators will now manage customer claims and oversee the return of funds. The case highlights increased regulatory scrutiny and reinforces the need for stronger risk assessment within FX and payment-service firms.