Select your preferred language
Language changes will apply immediately
Select your preferred language
Language changes will apply immediately
Common Mistakes in MTF Analysis
"Discover the most common mistakes traders make in multiple time frame (MTF) analysis. Learn how to avoid errors, improve accuracy, and build stronger trading strategies."
Wikilix Team
Educational Content Team
You might have heard traders emphasize the importance of multiple time frames (MTF) analysis. It makes perfect sense: First, check the higher time frame for the higher time trend, and then drop down to the lower time frames to find your entry. Sounds simple (and it is). But even using MTF analysis, some traders still struggle, not because MTF analysis is not practical, but because they fall into traps that diminish its efficiency.
If you've ever found yourself wondering why your trades consistently lose, even when using multiple time frames, this article is for you. We will identify the most common mistakes made when applying MTF analysis and propose ways to avoid them, ultimately enabling you to have more clarity and confidence when you trade.
MTF analysis is the observation of the same market across different time horizons, such as daily, 4-hour, and 15-minute charts. With each time frame, you develop a different observation: the higher time frame provides you with the big picture, the medium time range provides you with the setup, and the lower time range provides you with the entry. When used accurately, MTF analysis can help you avoid trading against the trend of the higher time frame, improve timing, and filter out noise. The premise of MTF analysis is not difficult, provided you apply it correctly and to the correct time frames.
Chart overanalysis is the most common trap traders fall into. Some traders look at nearly every possible interval from one minute to monthly, assuming they are gathering more data, which leads to better analysis. In fact, they are creating confusion for themselves and, in turn, indecisiveness.
How to avoid it: Make three charts your maximum, all showing complementary time frames, or all from the same class of time frames. For example, daily - 4H - 1H, or 4H - 1H - 15 minutes. This way, you will enjoy clarity, beyond feeling like you are drowning in the confusion caused by three conflicting signals.
A frequent blunder made by traders is to focus more on the lower time frame chart and forget about the higher time frame trend. Therefore, even if a 5-minute bullish signal occurs while the daily chart is in a strong downward trend, it does not matter. Most of the time, when traders enter a trade and it goes against the trend, they become disappointed.
How to Avoid It: Always start your analysis from a higher time frame. If it is sustaining a strong trend, trade in that direction. The lower time frames should give you just the confirmation, not erroneous signals against the higher time frame charts.
Lower time frame charts are full of whipsaws and false signals. Often, an immediate reaction to short-term volatility causes the trader to jump in and out of trades when prices are not actually reversing direction.
How to Avoid It: Use the lower time frame only for precision entry into the trades being traded on higher time frames. The higher time frame should establish the bias of the trade, and no small candlestick pattern should shake your conviction to follow that trade.
Similarly, a common mistake is simply choosing random time frames that consequently compound analysis time, which do not complement each other. For example, start by analyzing a 1-hour time frame and then proceed to a 1-minute time frame. The time frame is too disconnected from the time frame in which the analysis started.
How to Avoid It: Use a time frame sequence that is logical to apply, like 1:4 or 1:6 ratios for established higher time frames (i.e., daily to 4H and continue to hourly, or 4H to 1 hour to then 15 minute and on). Any ratios to adhere to will create smoother alignment, isolating perceived inconsistencies from time frames to analyze trades.
Sometimes, two time frames may not agree with what they are establishing. A trader may find an entry signal developing on a lower chart, but ignore or dismiss the contradiction on the longer chart. This "forcing it" mindset typically ends in losses.
How to Avoid It: Patience. If the charts are not lining up, wait. The best trading scenarios are when all timeframes are aligned and telling the same story.
Some traders are looking at multiple charts and indicators at the same time. This is called analysis paralysis. Rather than clarity, you are second-guessing every move.
How to Avoid It: Keep it very simple. Price action, basic moving averages, and a support/resistance framework are more than enough to remain simple and understand the larger picture. Indicators should always support what you are trying to analyze; they are not meant to be used dominantly for analysis.
There is no definite trade, even with the perfect MTF alignment. Traders assume that if they have multiple confirmations, they can take an oversized risk. When they are wrong and the market turns against them, the losses usually escalate quickly.
How to Avoid It: Always respect the rules of risk management by using stop losses, sizing positions, and never assume MTF analysis makes you invincible.
Some traders will enter based on a timeframe, then switch to another timeframe to justify staying in a losing position. This reaction is based on emotion and takes you further away from the disciplined plan, turning it into a gambled trade.
How to Avoid It: Before entering a trade, determine your entry point, stop loss, and target, based on your timeframes. Do not modify your own rules just because you follow your emotions during the trade.
A slight pullback on a lower chart can feel scary, but a pullback on a higher chart may be the reactionary pullback within that overall conditional trend. Too many trades jump too fast after a signal and close for the most significant pullbacks without identifying that key parts may still be ongoing.
How to Overcome It: Before deciding to stay or leave, zoom out and ask: Does the higher time frame stat unchanged? If so, it is likely noise.
Ultimately, regardless of any analysis, there is never going to be a 100% win rate, including MTF. Traders sometimes get the idea that once the conditions are shown perfectly as a signal with great accuracy, they will receive 100% profit upon completion, until they receive a reality check that trades also fail.
How to Overcome Issues: Recognize within the process that you indicate potential for loss. At the same time, MTF does have its higher probabilities, as dictates are not guaranteed on direct trades. Consistency over time is the name of the game, where a trader should favor quality trades over a 100% chance that a trade concept will deliver perfection.
Practical Example: To illustrate, you review EUR/USD, which is in an upward-trending line formation on the daily chart and is inverted at the 4-hour chart to test support. On the 15-minute chart, a bullish flexure supports it. Now you have three time frames that give you alignment for a potentially good trade on EUR/USD.
Similarly, for the EUR/USD pair, the daily chart indicates a downward trend line. The 4-hour chart is showing a consolidating pattern, which can either indicate consolidation or failure. On the 15-minute chart, a perfect buy signal is presented. As a trader, this is a setup with more risk; however, I noticed that each time frame was starting to diverge. This is what most trades fail to realize as they focus on how the end "yes" I saw was the 15-minute chart.
• Stick to the same three time frames consistently.
• Always start from a top-down analysis, high, medium, low.
• Focusing on alignment to complete confluence levels.
• Journal trades to reduce, eliminate, and or mention all things that went wrong.
• Patience, learn to be patient as it does take time to fully wait in and complete the alignment of times, which can set the edge of best quality setups.
Multi-time frame analysis, when executed correctly, is a compelling device for providing evidence and compelling probabilities to whatever edge you take in trading. Those small, simple, and extemporaneous mistakes, to ignore the time frame trend, to overload your charts, or to force trades, can cause a process that was once reliably effective and reliable to go into extreme confusion and randomness.
The simpler your approach is, the more transparent and professional your trading approach can be, and you can achieve confidence in it.
And finally, the more MTF, will not wholly and specifically guarantee or become predictable based on trades delivered; however, they can suggest dissuasions, to foreshadow views, and delivery rationale responses. The reality you are trying to execute in learning to read MTF is not based on slim winning tight lines. Still, realization helps confluence, or patterned noise, to clear mistakes that could be avoided, to resolve any issues that could, and to turn absolute chaos into clarity for the trade.
Keep building your knowledge with our structured learning path. Each section builds upon the previous one.
This is the first section
You're at the beginning of your journey!
This is the last section
You've completed this course!
24 min
Reading time
Intermediate
Difficulty