When AI GOLD judges it reasonably necessary, Article 29.2 lets it cancel your orders and the trades already filled on them, or stop your deposits and withdrawals. It owes you no notice, and the article says any loss that follows is yours.
Why this matters
A profit you have already banked can be removed after the fact, and your money can be frozen on the way out. The clause names no grounds, no time limit and no appeal, so there is no test you can hold AI GOLD to.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.
また、前項の規定にかかわらず、当社が合理的に必要であると判断した場合には、当社はお客様に何ら通知をすることなく、お客様の注文及び約定を取消し、あるいは入出金を停止することができるものとし、それにより生じる損害及び損失はお客様の負担とします。
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.Most agreements let a broker cancel a trade on a defined trigger, such as a manifest pricing error. This one folds three powers into a single sentence, cancelling filled trades, halting money in and out, and moving the loss to the client, and hangs all three on the firm's own view of what is necessary rather than on any stated ground.
- Worse together with Exhibit 2Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.One article stops the payment and the other lets the margin be retained, so a client chasing a withdrawal can be refused under either without either one naming a reason.
- Worse together with Exhibit 3Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.A cancelled trade shows up on a statement you have 10 business days to dispute, after which your silence counts as agreement to it.