You cannot tell from Aron's own site which company takes your money. The English pages say Aron Markets LTD is a Marshall Islands company, number 118046. The Persian pages say it is a Mauritius company, number C209254, regulated by the FSC. The Arabic pages say it is two separate companies sharing one trade name.
Why this matters
Which of the two holds your deposit decides where you would sue and which regulator, if any, would hear you. Aron gives a different answer to each language, and the agreement you sign names neither company.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.2The figure this clause puts a number on, taken from the broker's own words.
Aron Markets LTD, operates under the laws of the Marshall Islands with registered number 118046 and registered address of Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands.
Firms licensed by the FCA or CySEC must identify the contracting entity, its registered number and its regulator in the client agreement itself. Aron's client agreement names none of the three.
Aron Groups is not licensed by these regulators, so this is a comparison of practice, not a finding of any breach.
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.Brokers often run several entities and route clients to one by country. Publishing a different jurisdiction and registration number for the same named entity on different language versions of one site is different, because it leaves no version of the page that tells you which company you signed with.
- Worse together with Exhibit 2Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.A clause letting Aron take money from a connected account is harder to challenge when you cannot establish which company took it or under which law.