Licence number
C22059
View licence record- Licence holder
- Held by FTI Finance
One licence is on record for FTI Finance. One has been checked against an official register.
Back to FTI FinanceCounts of what is on record, not a rating. Each figure describes the register entries Wikilix holds and the checks it has run against them.
FTI Finance has one licence on record with Wikilix, issued by one authority across one jurisdiction. One of them was issued by a tier-1 or tier-2 authority — the regimes with the strictest capital, reporting and client-money rules. We located 1 of 1 on the issuing authority’s own register.
Every licence on record for FTI Finance, strongest authority first.
Each authority below publishes a register you can search. The name a register prints is often a separate legal entity, not the trading brand — search for the name given here.
CBI's own rules for the firms it authorises.
Answered from the register entries on this page.
Nothing indicates that it did. No client-money or segregated-account commitment was ever published, and without a regulator no such obligation applied. Deposits were exposed to the operator's own solvency and conduct.
The brand has a short recorded history of roughly two to five years and no verifiable founding date of its own. It is not possible to point to a documented start of trading, and the operation is no longer live.
Stop sending further funds immediately, including to anyone offering to recover an existing balance for a fee. Gather your deposit receipts, card statements and any correspondence, then raise a chargeback or recall with your bank or card issuer and report the matter to the financial regulator and the police in your own country. There is no regulator with jurisdiction over the brand itself to complain to.
No country policy can be established. The brand published no restricted-jurisdiction clause that survives, and its signup form is no longer reachable, so neither the countries it accepted nor those it refused are on record.
Card payments, bank transfers and electronic wallets were described as accepted. No withdrawal fee, limit or processing time was ever published for any of them, and with the site offline there is no working withdrawal channel at all.
An unnamed browser-based trading interface. No MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 or cTrader server, download or mobile application is on record for the brand, and no platform can be inspected now that the site is offline.
Spreads were advertised from 1.5 pips on Starter and Pro, from 0.8 pips on Trader and from 0 on Premium. No commission schedule, swap table or non-trading fee list was ever published, so the real cost of trading there cannot be established.
Up to 1:500 on the Starter and Pro tiers, 1:400 on Trader and 1:200 on Premium. Leverage of 1:500 to retail clients is far above the caps applied in the European Union, the United Kingdom and Australia.
250, quoted in euros or pounds, for the entry-level Starter account. The higher tiers started at 2,500 for Pro, 10,000 for Trader and 50,000 for Premium.
There is no evidence that it is. The company exists and is active on the Irish entity record, but its business is treasury and financial consultancy. A company registration is proof of corporate existence only. It is not a trading licence, and it does not permit anyone to accept client deposits.
No operator has been identified. The Irish name FTI Finance Limited, company number 136184, is attached to the brand, but that company is a Dublin treasury and financial consultancy business registered at International House, 3 Harbourmaster Place, IFSC, Dublin 1, and nothing shows it ran the trading site. No director, shareholder or management name is disclosed for the trading operation itself.
No. ftifinance.com does not serve the broker any more. Secure requests to the domain do not complete, and an ordinary request lands on a commercial listing offering the domain name for sale. There is no client portal, no terms page and no live account area.
We rate FTI Finance as a likely scam rather than a merely weak broker. It took deposits without any confirmed regulation, it attached the name and number of an unrelated Irish consultancy company to itself, and it has since abandoned its website entirely. That pattern is consistent with an operation that has closed rather than one that has been wound down for clients.