Goodwill Gold treats the English version of its contract as reference only, and the Chinese text decides any difference. The English withdrawal page does differ: it drops the $35 minimum withdrawal the Chinese page states.
Why this matters
You agreed to the Chinese terms, whichever page you read. Two withdrawal rules differ between the versions, and the one you may not be able to read is the one that counts.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.$35The figure this clause puts a number on, taken from the broker's own words.
英文譯本僅供參考,文義如與中文版本出現差別,概以中文為準。
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.A language supremacy clause is ordinary between businesses. Here it sits over a retail site that publishes a full English version of every page, including two withdrawal rules that do not match the Chinese.
- Worse together with Exhibit 8Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.The binding text is Chinese while the arbitration that settles any argument about it runs in English.