Every policy Maono Global Markets publishes says the Client Agreement with RocketX (Pty) Ltd is the contract you are bound by. The legal documents page links to it as TERMS & CONDITIONS. That link returns an error page, so the agreement cannot be read.
Why this matters
You are asked to accept terms nobody can see. Where the Risk Policy or the FAIS Disclosure conflicts with that missing agreement, the missing agreement wins, so the documents you can read are not the ones that decide your case.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.
In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Policy and the Client Agreement, the Client Agreement shall prevail to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency, save where this Policy expressly provides otherwise or where Applicable Law requires a different outcome.
Where it sits: section 4 of 27 in the RISK POLICY Maono Global Markets (Pty) Ltd, near the start.We counted the numbered sections in the RISK POLICY Maono Global Markets (Pty) Ltd. This clause sits in section 4 of 27, about 15% of the way through. A fee written on the first page and the same fee written near the end are not the same disclosure.
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.Brokers normally publish the client agreement and put the policies beside it. Here the one file that overrides all the published policies is the one file that is missing.