PPFX tells you on its deposit page that you cannot lose more than you put in. Its own Risk Disclosure then says four separate times that you are liable for the deficit if your account falls below zero.
Negative balance protection is a limit that stops you owing more than you put in. Without it, one fast market move can leave you owing the broker money on top of your deposit.
Why this matters
You could end up owing PPFX money after your account is emptied. Which sentence wins is a fight you would have to pay a South African lawyer to start.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.4The figure this clause puts a number on, taken from the broker's own words.
If you do not maintain sufficient Margin on your account at all times and/or provide such additional funds within the time required, your open positions may be closed at a loss, and you may be liable for any resulting deficit.
Where it sits: section 27 of 53 in the Risk Disclosure, 51% of the way through.We counted the numbered sections in the Risk Disclosure. This clause sits in section 27 of 53, about 51% of the way through. A fee written on the first page and the same fee written near the end are not the same disclosure.
Firms licensed by the FCA, CySEC and ASIC must give retail CFD clients negative balance protection, and the promise must be unqualified. PPFX makes the promise in one document and takes it back in another.
PPFX is not licensed by these regulators, so this is a comparison of practice, not a finding of any breach.
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.Brokers usually either grant negative balance protection or refuse it. PPFX does both, in documents published on the same shelf, and nothing in either says which one prevails.