Wikilix - Broker Reviews & Analysis

Your trusted platform for comprehensive broker reviews, analysis, and trading education. Making informed trading decisions through transparency and community insights.

Trusted by 50,000+ traders worldwide

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Regulators
  • Education
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy

Resources

  • All Brokers
  • Top Brokers
  • Scam Alerts
  • News
  • Spread Meter

Connect With Us

[email protected]
[email protected]
Secure & Encrypted
Global Broker Coverage

Broker categories

  • Tier 1 regulated
  • Tier 2 regulated
  • Tier 3 regulated
  • Tier 4 regulated
  • Onshore brokers
  • Offshore brokers
  • Unregulated brokers
  • Brokers by country
  • Broker rankings
© 2026 Wikilix. All Rights Reserved.

Trading involves risk. Please consider your investment objectives and risk tolerance before trading.

Wikilix
  • Home
  • Broker
  • Rankings
  • Regulators
  • Learn
  • Insights
  • Spread Meter
  • Prop Firms
Wikilix
Wikilix

Browse

  • Home
  • Learn
  • Spread Meter

Follow us

  1. Home
  2. Brokers
  3. FXCE
  4. Is FXCE a scam?
FXCE Limited logo

Independent safety report

Is FXCE a scam?

High risk (unverified)MEDIUM confidence
Updated August 12, 2026
Unregulated offshore copy-trading and token platform with a false regulation claim

FXCE is a high-risk, unregulated offshore operation, and we would not treat client money with it as safe. It is a Saint Vincent company that runs a copy-trading and token platform, holds no genuine financial licence, and has quietly moved its main website to a new brand.

  • The only paperwork behind it is a Saint Vincent company registration (LLC No. 357 LLC 2020). That is not a trading licence, and Saint Vincent's authority does not license forex firms.
  • No licence from any real regulator (FCA, ASIC, CySEC, NFA and similar) exists for FXCE. Client funds are not covered by any compensation scheme or fund segregation.
  • The main site, fxce.com, now permanently redirects to a different brand, NeoTech (neotechltd.com), and the second domain fxceltd.com no longer works.
  • FXCE runs its own token with staking plus a pooled 'investment fund' that connects investors to traders. That structure carries real loss-of-funds risk.
  • We found no regulator warning naming it and no confirmed pattern of stolen withdrawals, so we cannot call it an outright confirmed scam, only unregulated and high risk.
Full broker profileOfficial site

Safety verdict

High risk
0%Scam risk
2.5/5Safety rating 2.5 out of 5
Wikilix safety rating
medium
Confidence
At a glance
Proof of regulationNot found
Clone of another firmNo
TypeUnregulated offshore copy-trading and token platform with a false regulation claim
Evidence items9
  • VerdictReading now
  • Risk scorecard
  • Who they are
  • Regulation
  • Why this verdict
  • Evidence
  • The other side
  • What would change
  • Check it yourself
  • FAQ
  • What we recommend
Report progress
Total sections11
Read1
VerdictRisk scorecardWho they areRegulationWhy this verdict

Risk scorecard

Each area is scored 0 (clean) to 10 (worst). Higher means more risk.

Worst area: Critical
SeverityLowModerateHighCritical

Regulation

7/10 · High

No genuine financial licence while taking deposits; a Saint Vincent company registration is presented as regulation, and the SVG authority does not license forex.

Identity & transparency

6/10 · High

A real entity and address are verifiable, but the registration has lapsed, our record misnames it, and the brand is shifting to NeoTech with a different claimed home country.

Withdrawals & conduct

4/10 · Moderate

Complaints are mostly service and trading-condition issues (slow withdrawals, leverage changes); no systematic fund-integrity denial pattern could be independently confirmed.

Reputation

6/10 · High

Multiple review sites flag it as unregulated and high risk with very low aggregator scores and near-zero current traffic, though a few positive user reports exist and there is no warning-list hit.

Website claims

8/10 · Critical

Presents a company registration as regulation and has been reported to claim SVG FSA oversight that does not exist, alongside token and pooled-fund promises.

Operational history

5/10 · Moderate

About six years since the 2020 incorporation is some track record, but the original brand and domains are now being abandoned in favour of a 2025 successor domain.

Who they are

A quick desk file on the company behind the brand.

  • Brand: FXCE (now operating under the successor brand NeoTech)
  • Legal entity: FXCE LLC (our record says 'FXCE Limited')
  • Registered: First Floor, First St. Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Company number: 357 LLC 2020, incorporated 21 July 2020; the entity's global LEI registration has lapsed
  • Website: fxce.com (now redirects to neotechltd.com); fxceltd.com no longer resolves
  • Only 'licence': a Saint Vincent company registration presented as regulation. It is not a forex licence.
  • Offers: copy trading, trading bots, a pooled investment fund, MT5 accounts and a proprietary FXCE token with staking
  • Not accepted / not covered: no investor compensation, no segregated client accounts, no tier-1 or tier-2 oversight
  • Age claim: established 2020; the domain is older (2004) but sat parked until the trading platform launched around 2021
Global LEI corporate record for FXCE LLC, Saint Vincent, registration No. 357 LLC 2020, shown as lapsed. Captured August 2026.

Regulation

Who really oversees this broker, and what each licence is worth to you.

No proof found

Proof of regulation on an official register: No

We could not confirm this broker on any genuine regulator’s register.

Licences the broker publishes

Financial Services Authority of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

VerifiedNot a forex licenceLimited relevance
A Saint Vincent company registration (LLC No. 357 LLC 2020) presented as regulation. The SVG authority does not license or supervise forex and CFD trading, so this is not a financial licence and offers no client protection.
Protection: None. No investor compensation and no requirement to segregate client funds.Official register

Why we reached this verdict

How the evidence adds up.

We rate FXCE high risk because the protection a real broker gives is simply not present, and because the firm has misstated its regulatory status.

  • The regulation claim is false. FXCE leans on Saint Vincent company registration 357 LLC 2020 and has been reported to claim it is 'regulated by the SVG FSA'. Saint Vincent's authority publicly states it does not license or supervise forex and CFD brokers, so a company number there is not regulation.
  • No genuine licence anywhere. We found no FXCE entry on any recognised regulator's register, while the platform takes deposits for trading, copy trading and a pooled fund.
  • The money model adds risk. FXCE connects investors to traders through a pooled fund and runs its own token with staking. Schemes built around an in-house token and pooled returns are where client funds are most exposed.
  • The brand is being shed. The main domain now redirects to a new brand, NeoTech, on a domain registered in 2025, while the FXCE company's own registration lapsed and its secondary domain died. Abandoning the name that clients deposited under is a warning sign, even when the same operator continues.

We stopped short of a confirmed-scam verdict. We did not find a regulator warning naming FXCE, nor a verified pattern of refused withdrawals with specific amounts and dates. The operating entity is real and has a genuine address, and some users report the copy-trading tools working. So the honest reading is 'unregulated and high risk', not 'proven theft'. The operating age (about six years from the 2020 incorporation) is above the point where a young-firm caution would apply, so the score reflects the findings above rather than a thin-profile adjustment.

Evidence ledger

Every finding, with its source and how strongly it points.

5 against1 in favour
  • E1The main FXCE website fxce.com now returns a permanent (301) redirect to neotechltd.com, a different brand, showing the FXCE name is being shed while the operator continues.

    ModerateLive domain check
  • E2FXCE LLC is a real Saint Vincent company (No. 357 LLC 2020, incorporated 21 July 2020) but its global LEI registration is lapsed; the record is a company registration, not a forex licence.

    ModerateGlobal LEI database
  • E3No FXCE entry appears on any recognised regulator's register, and the firm relies on a Saint Vincent registration presented as regulation, where the SVG authority does not license forex. Self-refuting regulatory claim.

    StrongIndependent broker review
  • E4FXCE takes client deposits for trading, copy trading and a pooled fund with no licence from any authoritative regulator and no fund segregation or compensation scheme.

    StrongIndependent broker review
  • E5FXCE markets itself as a 'connection platform between traders and investors' with a pooled investment fund and a proprietary FXCE token with staking, a structure that concentrates loss-of-funds risk.

    ModerateArchived FXCE website
  • E6fxce.com was registered in 2004 but sat as a parked placeholder page (for example in 2015) until the FXCE trading platform launched around 2021, so the operation is about six years old, not two decades.

    ModerateArchived fxce.com snapshot
  • E7Domain records show fxce.com was registered 2004-09-18, confirming the aged-domain, newer-operation pattern rather than a long-established firm.

    WeakVerisign RDAP
  • E8The FXCE web presence has collapsed: fxceltd.com no longer resolves and fxce.com shows near-zero estimated monthly visits, consistent with the brand being wound down in favour of NeoTech.

    WeakIndependent broker review
  • E9Mitigating: a genuine registered entity exists at a real Kingstown address, some users report the copy-trading tools working, and no regulator warning list names FXCE as of August 2026.

    ModerateGlobal LEI database
Independent review of FXCE noting no licence in public registers and near-zero current site traffic. Captured August 2026.
Authoritative LEI entity record confirming FXCE LLC, jurisdiction Saint Vincent (VC), initial registration 21 July 2020, registration lapsed.
Domain registration record for fxce.com showing a 2004 creation date, an aged domain used for a newer trading operation.

The other side

The strongest case in this broker’s favour.

In fairness to FXCE, several things point the other way.

  • A real company exists. Saint Vincent records and the global LEI database both list FXCE LLC at a genuine Kingstown address, so this is not a faceless shell with no paper trail.
  • Copy trading and social trading are legitimate models. A Saint Vincent registration, while weak, is the same low-cost setup used by many real offshore brokers, not proof of fraud on its own.
  • Some users report the bots and copy-trading features working and paying, and one mainstream review aggregator rates it around the middle rather than the bottom.
  • The move to the NeoTech brand comes with a South African FSCA authorisation held by a related entity. That looks more like a push toward (weak) regulation than an operator running off with client money.
  • We found no regulator warning list naming FXCE or its domains as of August 2026.

What would change this

What we would need to see to revise the verdict.

Our view would move if any of the following turned up.

  • Toward a confirmed scam: a regulator warning that names fxce.com, fxceltd.com or FXCE LLC; or several independent, detailed reports of refused or reversed withdrawals with amounts, dates and account details; or a demand for an extra payment ('tax', 'fee', 'unlock') before releasing funds.
  • Toward lower risk: a genuine, in-force trading licence from a real regulator that names the entity actually holding client money and lists the site's domain, verifiable on that regulator's own register.
  • On identity: a clear, public confirmation that FXCE clients and balances have been carried over cleanly to the NeoTech brand, or evidence that they have not.

Check it yourself

Official registers and warning lists. Verify every claim first-hand.

4 sources

FXCE LLC corporate record (Global LEI)

Confirms FXCE LLC is a Saint Vincent company (No. 357 LLC 2020), registration lapsed. A company registration, not a trading licence.

FXCE LLC record in the Global LEI database

Authoritative entity record: name, Saint Vincent jurisdiction, incorporation date and lapsed registration status.

Independent FXCE review

Third-party review noting no licence in public registers and near-zero current site traffic.

Former FXCE website (archived)

Archived FXCE LLC homepage before the domain was redirected to the NeoTech brand.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about this broker’s safety.

12 questions
Is FXCE a scam?

We rate FXCE unregulated and high risk rather than a proven scam. It holds no genuine financial licence, presents a Saint Vincent company registration as if it were regulation, and has moved its main site to a new brand. We did not find a regulator warning or a confirmed pattern of stolen withdrawals, so we cannot call it a confirmed scam, but we would not treat funds with it as safe.

Is FXCE regulated?

No. FXCE relies on Saint Vincent company registration 357 LLC 2020. Saint Vincent's authority does not license or supervise forex and CFD brokers, so this is not regulation. We found no licence for FXCE on any recognised regulator's register.

Can I withdraw my money from FXCE?

There is no regulatory guarantee that you can. Reviews mention slow or troublesome withdrawals, and the platform is unregulated with no fund segregation. If you hold a balance, request a withdrawal now and keep records of every step.

Is my money safe with FXCE?

No compensation scheme or segregated-account rule protects FXCE clients. Because it is unregulated and uses a pooled 'investment fund' plus an in-house token, client money is exposed and hard to recover if something goes wrong.

Who owns FXCE?

The operating entity is FXCE LLC, a Saint Vincent company registered at First Floor, First St. Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street, Kingstown. The same operation now runs under the NeoTech brand at neotechltd.com.

How old is FXCE?

The company was incorporated in July 2020, so the operation is about six years old. The domain fxce.com is older (registered 2004) but sat parked and unrelated until the trading platform launched around 2021, so the brand is not decades old.

What is the FXCE licence 357 LLC 2020 worth?

Nothing as protection. 357 LLC 2020 is a company registration number in Saint Vincent, not a forex trading licence. It says the company exists, not that anyone supervises how it handles your money.

Is FXCE a clone of another broker?

We found no evidence that FXCE impersonates a specific regulated firm, so it is not a clone. The concern here is the false regulation claim and lack of any real licence, not identity theft of another company.

What is the FXCE token and is staking it safe?

FXCE runs a proprietary token with staking. Money placed into an operator's own token or a fixed-return staking offer is high risk and often impossible to recover, so treat any such offer with great caution.

Why does fxce.com now show a different brand?

The FXCE main domain now permanently redirects to neotechltd.com, a newer brand run by the same operator. The secondary domain fxceltd.com no longer works. Moving away from the name clients deposited under is a warning sign, even when the operator continues.

Does the NeoTech FSCA licence protect FXCE clients?

The FSCA authorisation belongs to a separate South African entity used by the successor brand and is aimed at a Vietnam-focused business. We did not verify that it covers the FXCE operation or the money it already holds, so we do not treat it as protection for FXCE clients.

What should I check before depositing with any broker like this?

Confirm a real, in-force licence on the regulator's own register, that the licensed entity is the one holding your funds, and that the site's domain is listed. Reject a company-registration number offered as 'regulation', and avoid brokers pushing in-house tokens or guaranteed returns.

What we recommend

The practical takeaway from everything above.

Our advice

Treat FXCE as unsafe for deposits until it can show real regulation.

  • Do not send new funds. There is no compensation scheme and no fund segregation behind this operation.
  • If you hold a balance, try to withdraw it now and keep written records of every request and response.
  • Be cautious about the FXCE token and any 'staking' or fixed-return offer. Money in a proprietary token is hard to recover.
  • Verify any 'licence' yourself on the regulator's own register before believing it, and ignore a company-registration number offered as proof of regulation.
  • If you have already lost money, report it to your local financial regulator and your bank or card provider.

This is an independent assessment of risk, not a legal ruling. Scores and verdicts follow the Wikilix broker-safety methodology and can change as new evidence appears. Review scores are treated with caution when a broker’s reviews look manipulated. Last reviewed August 12, 2026. If any detail here is out of date or incorrect, or you represent this broker, please contact us.