MaximusFX calls itself a registered and regulated company on its home page, and an authorized CFDs broker on its legal page. Its own AML policy describes what it sells as unlicensed brokerage services.
Why this matters
No MaximusFX document names a regulator or a licence number. The supervisor and the complaints scheme you expect to sit behind a regulated broker are not there.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Harder than usualHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.
The company does not intentionally target residents of jurisdictions where unlicensed brokerage services are prohibited, including the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada and Australia.
Firms licensed by the FCA or CySEC must state the regulator's name and their licence number in public material. MaximusFX publishes a company registration number from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and names no regulator in any document.
MaximusFX is not licensed by these regulators, so this is a comparison of practice, not a finding of any breach.
- Worse together with Exhibit 6Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.The pages claiming EU and UK standards sit above a signup form that accepts clients from both, while the AML policy says the company does not target either.

What traders say about MaximusFX
Comments on MaximusFX are posted on its profile
Nobody has commented on MaximusFX yet. If you have traded with them, your experience helps the next reader decide.
Write the first comment