The English withdrawal table charges 3-6$ for a USDT (TRC20) withdrawal. The Farsi version of the same table charges 0.15%. Both pages are headed with a promise of free withdrawals, and clause 27.12 says anything not in English does not bind the company.
Why this matters
A Farsi speaker reads a page in their own language, funds an account on the strength of it, and has agreed to a contract saying only the English wording counts. When the two disagree about what a withdrawal costs, the version never read is the one that wins.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.
برداشت رایگان وجه، بدون کارمزد پنهان
Our readingOur own comment on the clause, not the broker's words. Anything we quote is marked as a quotation.A localised site is normal. Publishing a different fee for the same payment method in a second language, while the contract strips that language of legal effect, puts the marketing that recruits the client outside the agreement entirely.
- Worse together with Exhibit 4Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.The page promising free withdrawals is what a client checks before agreeing to a contract that charges 3% to 6% for withdrawing without trading.