Risk scorecard
Each area is scored 0 (clean) to 10 (worst). Higher means more risk.
Regulation
9/10 · CriticalNo licence from any authority at any point, while acting as a market maker taking retail deposits, plus a regulator alert-list entry for unlicensed activity.
Identity & transparency
8/10 · CriticalA regulator found its published Hong Kong address false, and the registered office moved from Jersey to the British Virgin Islands with a Delaware company behind it, though the Delaware entity itself is verifiable.
Withdrawals & conduct
3/10 · LowNo fund-integrity or service complaints were found on any platform, so nothing here counts against the firm, but nor is there any evidence that clients were paid out.
Reputation
7/10 · HighA regulator alert and, for a brand claiming clients in more than fifty countries over twenty-four years, no reviews at all on any mainstream platform.
Website claims
7/10 · HighCredit for never faking a licence, but the regulator found its stated Hong Kong presence false and its worldwide office list and client claims are unverifiable.
Operational history
3/10 · LowTwenty-four years verified from the domain and the Delaware register, which is genuinely long, offset by the operation having been non-functional since 2018.
Who they are
A quick desk file on the company behind the brand.
- Brand: Reymount
- Legal entity: Reymount Investment Ltd. (also written Reymount Investment Limited)
- Registered: Delaware, United States, file number 3485090, incorporated 28 January 2002. The site itself has separately published a Jersey registered office (2004) and a British Virgin Islands address in Road Town, Tortola (2016 to 2018).
- Website: www.reymount.com, registered 25 January 2002, now returning a server error
- Only licence: None. No regulator is named anywhere on the site, and no register lists it.
- Offers: Forex, CFDs, metals and bullion, an in-house web trading platform, an introducing broker programme and white label services
- Not accepted: Residents of the United States and the United Kingdom, by the company's own notice
- Age claim: None advertised. We independently verified about twenty-four years of history from the domain and the Delaware register.
Regulation
Who really oversees this broker, and what each licence is worth to you.
Proof of regulation on an official register: No
We could not confirm this broker on any genuine regulator’s register.
No licence claims on record.
Why we reached this verdict
How the evidence adds up.
Three findings drive this, and they point the same way.
- A regulator listed it as unlicensed and said its address was false. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission added Reymount Investments Limited to its Alert List on 5 May 2004 under the heading of unlicensed entities. The entry records a Wanchai address and states plainly that the company gives that address but is not located there, and that it claims to operate from Jersey.
- We tied that alert to this broker. The regulator's record carries no website, so we checked the broker's own pages from the same period. Its About page from October 2004 lists a registered office at P.O. Box 124, Langtry House, 40 Le Motte Street, St Helier, Jersey, together with an operations address at 40 Craven Street in London. The Jersey claim, the brand, the forex and bullion business and the 2004 timing all line up. We treat this as a strong tie rather than a certainty, because the regulator did not record a domain.
- It sold as a market maker with no licence at all. Its own About page states that as a market maker Reymount provides consistent liquidity to our client base, and the site opened live and mini trading accounts. That is a business holding client money as the counterparty to their trades. Across the whole archive, from 2003 to the final working pages in 2018, we found no regulator named, no licence number, no register link and no regulatory disclosure of any kind.
Two further points shape the score. The corporate identity shifts: a Jersey registered office in 2004, a British Virgin Islands address by 2016, and a Delaware corporation of the same name whose registered agent is now the Delaware Secretary of State. And the operation is dark. Every archived capture since 2019 is a redirect or a server error, and the site returns an error today, yet the brand still surfaces in search results describing itself as an introducing broker for Kuwait.
We should be equally clear about what we did not find. There are no customer complaints anywhere. We found no withdrawal disputes, no demand for a fee to release funds, and no enforcement action for fraud. The verdict rests on the regulator's alert and on twenty-four years of unlicensed deposit taking, not on victim reports.
Evidence ledger
Every finding, with its source and how strongly it points.
E1The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission lists Reymount Investments Limited as an unlicensed entity, added 5 May 2004, recording a Wanchai address and stating the company gives the above address but it is not located there, and that it claims to operate from Jersey.
E2The broker's own About page from October 2004 lists its registered office as Reymount Investment Ltd., P.O. Box 124, Langtry House, 40 Le Motte Street, St Helier, Jersey, with an operations office at 40 Craven Street, London. This matches the regulator's note that the alerted firm claimed to operate from Jersey and ties the alert to this operation.
E3The About page states that as a market maker Reymount provides consistent liquidity to our client base via a real time Internet-based trading platform, and the site opened live and mini trading accounts. This is a firm holding client money as counterparty, with no regulator named anywhere on the page.
E4The disclaimer page, the last full legal text the site published, names no regulator and states only that exchange traded products are not offered to United States and United Kingdom residents for regulatory reasons. There is no authorisation disclosure of any kind.
E5The worldwide contacts page gives a British Virgin Islands address at the O'Neal Marketing Associates Building, Wickham's Cay 2, Road Town, Tortola, alongside offices listed in Azerbaijan, Botswana, Costa Rica, Jordan, Malaysia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka and Venezuela, none of them covered by any licence.
E6The last working homepage, from December 2018, markets an introducing broker programme, live and demo account opening, and forex, CFD and metals trading under Reymount Investment Ltd, with no regulator or licence mentioned in the footer.
E7Every archived capture of the site from 2019 onward is a redirect or a server error, with no successful page load recorded since December 2018. The site returns a server error today.
E8Delaware's Division of Corporations records REYMOUNT INVESTMENT LTD., file number 3485090, a domestic general corporation incorporated on 28 January 2002, with the Delaware Secretary of State shown as registered agent. This confirms the company genuinely exists and is long established, but is a company registration and not a financial licence.
E9The registry record for reymount.com shows the domain was created on 25 January 2002 and has been continuously renewed to a 2027 expiry, three days before the Delaware company was incorporated. There is no sign of an expired domain being re-registered by a new operator.
E10Trustpilot has no review page for reymount.com, and searches of Forex Peace Army, Reddit and the open web returned no customer accounts of any kind, positive or negative. No withdrawal dispute or advance-fee demand was found against this brand.
The other side
The strongest case in this broker’s favour.
The fair case for Reymount, and where each part of it holds or fails.
- The company is real and old. This is true and we credit it. Delaware's register shows Reymount Investment Ltd. incorporated on 28 January 2002, three days after the domain was registered. The archive shows one continuous brand from 2003 onward, with no sign of a lapsed domain being caught and reused. This is not a throwaway shell.
- It never lied about being regulated. Also true, and it matters. Many bad brokers paste a fake licence number in the footer. Reymount did not. It named no regulator and made no false authorisation claim, which is more honest than the pattern we usually see.
- The alert might be a different company. The regulator wrote Reymount Investments Limited with an s, our broker is Reymount Investment Limited, and no website was recorded. We took this seriously and tested it. The broker's own Jersey registered office, published in the same year the alert was issued, is what closed the gap. We could not fully exclude a coincidence, and that is why our confidence is medium rather than high.
- No client ever complained. We searched Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, Reddit and the open web and found nothing, positive or negative. No one has publicly accused this firm of stealing money. An operation with no complaints in twenty-four years is not the profile of an aggressive boiler room.
- Being unlicensed is not automatically fraud. Correct as a general rule, and we apply it. But it does not rescue this case: a firm acting as the counterparty to retail forex and CFD trades is not a business that any major jurisdiction leaves unlicensed by design, and a regulator specifically found its published address to be false.
What would change this
What we would need to see to revise the verdict.
Concrete things that would move this verdict in either direction.
- Evidence that the Hong Kong alert concerns a genuinely different company, for example a regulator correction naming a different domain or a different corporate identity, would remove the strongest single item and drop this to high risk unverified.
- A current entry for Reymount Investment Ltd on any recognised financial regulator's register, covering dealing in investments rather than advice, would change the regulation finding outright.
- Documented evidence that client balances were returned in full when the platform stopped working would materially improve the picture.
- Going the other way, a single credible first hand account of a blocked withdrawal, an account frozen with a balance on it, or a demand for a fee or tax before funds were released would push this to confirmed.
- A second regulator alert naming reymount.com by domain, or an enforcement action against the Delaware or Jersey entity, would do the same.
- Evidence that the brand has been revived on a new domain, or that the same operators are running a successor firm, would extend this history to that successor.
Check it yourself
Official registers and warning lists. Verify every claim first-hand.
Hong Kong SFC Alert List entry for Reymount Investments Limited
The regulator's own record listing the firm as an unlicensed entity since 5 May 2004.
Hong Kong SFC Alert List, letter R
The full alphabetical alert list where the entry appears.
Delaware Division of Corporations entity search
Search REYMOUNT to see the company record, file number 3485090.
Domain registration record for reymount.com
Registry record showing the domain was created on 25 January 2002.
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers about this broker’s safety.
Is Reymount a scam?
In our assessment it is very likely a scam. It took retail trading deposits as a market maker without any financial licence, and Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission listed it as an unlicensed entity in May 2004 while noting that the address it published was false. We rate the risk at 70 percent.
Is Reymount regulated?
No. We found no licence from any regulator anywhere, and the company never even claimed one. Across more than twenty years of archived pages, no regulator, licence number or register link appears on the site.
Can I still withdraw my money from Reymount?
Almost certainly not through the website. It has served no working page since 2018 and returns a server error today. If you hold a balance, collect your statements and correspondence immediately and speak to your bank or card issuer about a chargeback.
Was my money ever protected with Reymount?
No. Because there was no licence, there was no regulator supervising how client funds were held, no requirement to keep them separate from company money, and no compensation scheme to claim against if the firm failed.
Who owns Reymount Investment Limited?
That is not publicly disclosed. The site never named directors or owners. A Delaware corporation called Reymount Investment Ltd. exists on the state register, but Delaware does not publish ownership, and the company also published Jersey and British Virgin Islands addresses at different times.
How old is Reymount?
About twenty-four years on paper. The domain reymount.com was registered on 25 January 2002 and the Delaware company was incorporated on 28 January 2002. However, the website has not functioned since 2018, so the working life of the business was roughly sixteen years.
What did the Hong Kong regulator actually say?
The Securities and Futures Commission added Reymount Investments Limited to its Alert List on 5 May 2004 as an unlicensed entity. It recorded a Wanchai address and stated that the company gives that address but is not located there, and that it claims to operate from Jersey.
Is Reymount a clone of another broker?
No. We found no evidence it copied another firm's name, licence number or corporate identity. Its problem is the absence of any licence rather than the theft of someone else's.
Reymount is registered in Delaware. Does that make it safe?
No. A company registration is not a financial licence. Delaware records that the company exists and nothing more. It says nothing about whether the firm was permitted to hold client money or trade on their behalf.
Why are there no customer reviews of Reymount?
There is no Trustpilot page for the domain and we found no threads on Forex Peace Army or Reddit. For a firm that claimed clients in more than fifty countries, that absence is itself a warning sign rather than a clean record.
I was contacted by someone claiming to represent Reymount. What should I do?
Do not send money and do not share identity documents or card details. The original website stopped working years ago, so anyone soliciting under this brand today is operating outside it. Report the approach to your national financial regulator.
What should I check before depositing with any broker?
Find the licence number on the broker's site, then open the regulator's own register and confirm that both the exact legal entity and the website address appear there. If the broker names no regulator at all, as Reymount did not, treat that as decisive and walk away.
What we recommend
The practical takeaway from everything above.
Treat this brand as unsafe and do not send it money.
- Do not deposit with anyone presenting themselves as Reymount. The website has not worked since 2018, so any live approach using this name is being made outside the original operation.
- Be especially careful with introducing brokers, agents or account managers in Kuwait, Jordan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, South Africa, Spain or Venezuela who invoke this brand. The company listed offices in all of those places and none of them were covered by a licence.
- If you have money with this firm, gather your account statements, deposit records and all correspondence now, and ask your bank or card issuer about a chargeback while records still exist.
- Report your loss to the financial regulator where you live, and to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission if you were approached from Hong Kong.
- Before using any broker, check the regulator's own register yourself and confirm that the entity name and the website both appear on it.
This is an independent assessment of risk, not a legal ruling. Scores and verdicts follow the Wikilix broker-safety methodology and can change as new evidence appears. Review scores are treated with caution when a broker’s reviews look manipulated. Last reviewed August 28, 2026. If any detail here is out of date or incorrect, or you represent this broker, please contact us.