Risk scorecard
Each area is scored 0 (clean) to 10 (worst). Higher means more risk.
Regulation
7/10 · HighTakes retail deposits with no financial services licence anywhere, while displaying an ASIC logo over a company number and claiming FinCEN as a regulator; credit given that the numbers are genuine and its own rather than fabricated or another firm's.
Identity & transparency
8/10 · CriticalEntities and a registered address are disclosed and one verifies on ASIC's register, but no owner, director or manager is named anywhere, three differently named entities sit across three jurisdictions with no explanation of which holds client money, the addresses are a Kingstown mass registration suite and a Denver mailbox, and the SuperForex identity is concealed.
Withdrawals & conduct
7/10 · HighFund integrity reports pass three of four pattern axes: legacy balances stranded after the rebrand with a quoted MetaTrader account number, corroborated by the firm's own written admission that accounts were not migrated, plus withdrawal complaints logged by an independent review service; the firm does answer complaints and offered to restore access, and no demand for extra payment to release funds was found.
Reputation
8/10 · CriticalThree regulator warnings against the operation it continues, an independent review service rating it unregulated and high risk, and a footprint of four Trustpilot reviews with three at one star against a claim of 3 million traders; the positive posts that exist read promotional and cluster in two countries.
Website claims
9/10 · CriticalOutright false statements on the live site: regulation by a tier one authority it is not licensed by, 12 years of operation and 'Since 2013' on domains eight months old at launch, eight awards that belong to an unnamed predecessor, 3 trillion dollars of volume, 3 million traders and funds security of 100 percent.
Operational history
8/10 · CriticalComputed track record about 18 months: oldest domain 4 February 2025, oldest datable company 21 May 2025, against an advertised 12 years, a gap of roughly 11 years with the predecessor never named; the predecessor itself wound down owing clients access to their accounts.
Who they are
A quick desk file on the company behind the brand.
- Brand: SuperFin, also styled SuperFin Global, with the ticker style SF
- Legal entity that contracts with you: SuperFin Corp, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, registration 1671 CTD 2024
- Other entities in the group: SuperFin Corp Pty Ltd, Australia, ACN 687 282 499, registered 21 May 2025; Superfin Corp Limited, a FinCEN money services business registrant at a Denver, Colorado mailbox address, filed 24 November 2025
- Registered: Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The Australian company's registered office is in Brisbane City, Queensland.
- Website: superfin.global and superfinfx.com, both registered 4 February 2025 and serving the same site; client portal at my.superfin.global
- Only licence: none. No financial services licence from any regulator. What exists is a Saint Vincent company number, an Australian company number and a United States anti money laundering registration.
- Offers: forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrency and index CFDs on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, leverage to 1:500, minimum deposit 50 dollars, deposit bonuses of 10 and 30 percent, copy trading
- Not accepted: residents and citizens of Canada, Japan, the United States, New Zealand and countries under EU sanctions. Japan and New Zealand are the two countries whose regulators warned about the predecessor brand.
- Age claim: '12 years of operation in the market' and 'Since 2013'. The records support roughly 18 months under this identity.
- Predecessor: SuperForex, operated by Finateqs Corp of Belize, founded 2013, wound down in late 2024
Regulation
Who really oversees this broker, and what each licence is worth to you.
Proof of regulation on an official register: No
We could not confirm this broker on any genuine regulator’s register.
Licences the broker publishes
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Financial Services Authority, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), United States
Why we reached this verdict
How the evidence adds up.
Five findings carry this verdict, in order of weight.
- Three regulators publicly warned about the operation this broker continues, and nothing has been severed. Japan's Financial Services Agency published Finateqs Corp, service name SuperForex, on its list of firms conducting financial instruments business without registration, for soliciting over the counter derivatives trading over the internet. New Zealand's Financial Markets Authority warned on 7 November 2024 that SuperForex was not on the Financial Service Provider Register and that it and its brokers were not authorised to offer financial services to New Zealand investors, naming individuals posing as SuperForex brokers. Spain's CNMV warned against superforex.com in June 2024. Under our method a rename does not clear that history unless the operations were genuinely severed, and here the opposite is documented: SuperFin itself confirmed the transition in writing, the legacy MetaTrader accounts stayed live on the operator's server, and the Belize entity behind SuperForex was itself formerly named SUPERFIN CORP.
- It claims to be regulated by ASIC and is not. The jurisdiction notice reads that SuperFin Corp Pty Ltd is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission with 'license number (ACN) 687 282 499'. ASIC's company register shows that number belongs to SUPERFIN CORP PTY LTD, type Australian Proprietary Company Limited By Shares, registered 21 May 2025, with the only lodged document being its application for registration. ASIC issues company numbers as the corporate registrar; they say nothing about permission to deal in financial products. ASIC's own register pages state that anyone offering a financial product must hold an Australian Financial Services licence. SuperFin publishes no such licence number on any page of its site, and provides no link to any regulator's register for a reader to check.
- The advertised history belongs to someone else. The homepage counts '12 years of operation' and eight best broker awards running from 2015 to 2023. Those are SuperForex's awards, from the same issuers in the same years, and they still sit on the archived SuperForex homepage. Both SuperFin domains were registered on 4 February 2025 within the same minute, and the oldest company we could date is the Australian one from May 2025. That gives a real track record of roughly 18 months against an advertised 12 years, and the predecessor whose history is being borrowed is never named anywhere on the site.
- Nothing between the client and the firm's discretion. With no financial services licence there is no compensation scheme, no segregation requirement a supervisor enforces and no statutory complaints route, yet the funds security page promises that client money is 'stored separately from company funds' and will 'remain safe and unaffected by SuperFin's own finances', and the homepage advertises funds security of 100 percent. The 30 percent bonus agreement then requires 90 lots of turnover on a 1,000 dollar deposit, roughly 9 million dollars of notional volume, before capital can be withdrawn, failing which the bonus credit is deducted, and it reserves the right to revoke participation and block account access at the firm's sole discretion. Clients of the predecessor described exactly that mechanism taking their profit and balance.
- The money has already failed to come back for some clients. A trader reported in July 2025 that after the rebrand his email was not recognised, live chat told him the firm had no access to old customer accounts, and yet his MetaTrader account, quoted by number, still existed on the server with his funds on it. SuperFin's own reply apologised for the transition and said database migration required manual account linking in some cases. An independent broker review service rates SuperFin unregulated and high risk and logs a violation entry over the Saint Vincent claim, and records withdrawal complaints against it. The predecessor's complaint record is heavier still, with blocked withdrawals, bonus restrictions and unpaid withdrawal requests running to several thousand dollars.
This is not a confirmed scam verdict for one reason: no regulator has yet warned about SuperFin itself or either of its domains, and the trading operation behind it is real, not a fake screen. The misrepresentation, however, is current and on the live site today.
Evidence ledger
Every finding, with its source and how strongly it points.
E1Japan's Financial Services Agency lists Finateqs Corp, service name SuperForex, on its published list of operators conducting financial instruments business without registration, for soliciting over the counter derivatives trading over the internet, entered November 2024. This is the operation SuperFin continues.
E2IOSCO's I-SCAN index of regulators' alert lists returns three warnings for SuperForex: the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority on 7 November 2024, the Spanish CNMV naming superforex.com on 5 June 2024, and the Japanese FSA naming Finateqs Corp on 2 December 2024. The FMA records that SuperForex was not on the Financial Service Provider Register and that it and its brokers were not authorised to offer financial services to New Zealand investors.
Hard proofIOSCO I-SCAN, search for superforexE3ASIC's company register shows ACN 687 282 499 belongs to SUPERFIN CORP PTY LTD, type Australian Proprietary Company Limited By Shares, status Registered, registration date 21 May 2025, next review 21 May 2027, registered office in Brisbane City QLD 4000, with the only lodged document being its application for registration. This is a company registration, not a financial services licence.
E4SuperFin's own homepage displays an ASIC logo with the words 'REGULATED BY ASIC' and 'Australian Securities & Investments Commission', states that SuperFin Corp Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC with 'license number (ACN) 687 282 499', states that SuperFin Corp is a registered financial services provider in Saint Vincent with 'license number 1671 CTD 2024', and claims to be 'Globally regulated in multiple jurisdictions including ASIC and FinCEN'. No link to any regulator's register is provided for a reader to verify.
E5Domain registration records show superfin.global and superfinfx.com were both created on 4 February 2025 within the same minute, through GoDaddy and on Cloudflare nameservers. The homepage advertises '12 years of operation in the market' and the About page states 'Since 2013, we have been providing top-tier trading and investment services'.
E6The archived SuperForex homepage from December 2024 carries a company notice dated 3 September 2024 reading that Superforex is undergoing a significant transition, will no longer accept new customers and will be discontinuing services for existing customers. The same page carries the identical award list SuperFin now advertises, from the same issuers in the same years, and the page title 'Forex Broker | Online Currency Trading with SuperForex (SF)' against SuperFin's current 'Forex Broker | Online Currency Trading with SuperFin (SF)'. superforex.com no longer resolves.
E7A client reported in July 2025 that he had registered when the firm was called SuperForex, found the site shut down and rebranded, was told his email matched no customer account, and was told by live chat that the firm had no access to old customer accounts, yet logging into MetaTrader with his old account number showed the account and his funds still present on the server. SuperFin's public reply apologises for the frustration caused during its transition and rebranding process and states that database migrations required manual account linking in certain cases. The profile holds four reviews, three of them one star.
E8The Belize company behind SuperForex, FINATEQS CORP., was previously named SUPERFIN CORP. and was renamed around 1 December 2021. The current Saint Vincent contracting entity for this broker is named SuperFin Corp, which ties the two operations at entity level.
E9The Belize Financial Services Commission licence 000160/344, held by Finateqs Corp for SuperForex, is recorded as no longer authorised. The same record notes that the CNMV, the New Zealand FMA and the Japanese FSA flag SuperForex for the absence of required authorisation, that SuperForex was founded in 2013, and that its complaint profile includes blocked withdrawals, misleading promotional terms and difficulty accessing funds earned from deposit bonuses. The rebrand therefore shed the only real licence the operation ever held.
E10An independent broker review service rates SuperFin unregulated and high risk, names superfinfx.com, and logs a violation entry dated 15 September 2025 stating that SuperFin claims to be regulated through a Saint Vincent registration, that the Saint Vincent FSA does not regulate forex or issue financial trading licences, and that the regulatory claims are therefore misleading and unsubstantiated. It also records withdrawal complaints against the broker.
E11FinCEN's money services business register holds an entry for Superfin Corp Limited at 1312 17th Street, Unit 2955, Denver, Colorado 80202, received 24 November 2025, with zero branches and activity declared across all states. FinCEN's own page warns that fraudsters use its registration process to defraud the public, that a company should not be trusted merely because it is listed, that FinCEN approves and endorses no registrant, and that any claim of FinCEN approval is false and may be part of a scam. The broker nonetheless advertises FinCEN as one of its regulators, and separately states it does not serve United States residents.
ModerateFinCEN MSB Registrant SearchE12The 30 percent bonus agreement requires turnover of 90 lots on a 1,000 dollar deposit, roughly 9 million dollars of notional volume, before capital can be withdrawn, and states that withdrawing or touching the capital participating in the bonus results in deduction of the entire bonus credit. It also reserves the right to deny, withhold or revoke participation at the firm's sole discretion, to cancel terms with a customer, terminate services and block account access, and to deduct amounts directly from the trading account where hedging is suspected.
E13The funds security page promises that client money is stored separately from company funds, guaranteeing it is used exclusively for the client's transactions, and that in financial distress the client's money will remain safe and unaffected by SuperFin's own finances. It names no compensation scheme and no insurance, and repeats the ASIC and Saint Vincent numbers as its regulatory basis. The homepage advertises funds security of 100 percent, trading volume above 3 trillion dollars and 3 million traders.
ModerateSuperFin funds security pageE14Neither the About page, the funds security page, the payment methods page nor the footer legal notice mentions SuperForex, a predecessor brand or any rebrand. The firm acknowledges the transition only in a reply to a complaint on a review site, while presenting the predecessor's 12 year history and its awards as its own.
ModerateSuperFin About pageE15No warning, alert or blacklist entry naming SuperFin, superfin.global or superfinfx.com appears on IOSCO's I-SCAN, which aggregates the alert lists of more than 150 regulators. Recorded as a clean result at 9 October 2026.
E16The Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Financial Services Authority investor alerts name no entity or website connected to SuperFin, SuperForex or Finateqs Corp.
E17ASIC's company register confirms the Australian entity exists under exactly the name the broker publishes, and returns 15 unrelated Australian businesses containing the word superfin. The findings on Superfin rest only on ACN 687 282 499, superfin.global and superfinfx.com, and Saint Vincent registration 1671 CTD 2024, not on the records of similarly named businesses.
E18superfinfx.com redirects to the same site as superfin.global and serves identical content under the title 'Forex Broker | Online Currency Trading with SuperFin (SF)', confirming both domains on record are one operation rather than separate firms.
ModerateSuperFin alternate domain
The other side
The strongest case in this broker’s favour.
The case for SuperFin, made as strongly as the evidence allows.
- The platform is real. This is not an empty shell with a payment form. MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 servers run under the brand, the mobile downloads route through MetaQuotes' own distribution, demo credentials are published openly and the homepage carries a live quote feed. A genuine trading operation exists.
- The company numbers are genuine, and they are its own. None of these numbers is a fabricated reference or another firm's credential, which is the more common and more serious pattern. ACN 687 282 499 resolves on ASIC's register to a real company bearing exactly the name the broker publishes. The FinCEN registration is a real filing. This is a disclosed operator overstating what its paperwork means, not an impersonator wearing a regulated firm's identity.
- It discloses its entities and address. The footer names the contracting company, its registration number and a street address, which many offshore brokers do not.
- No regulator has warned about SuperFin. IOSCO's I-SCAN, which aggregates the alert lists of more than 150 regulators, returns no warning for SuperFin or its domains. The Saint Vincent authority's investor alerts name nothing connected to it either. The warnings we rely on name the predecessor brand.
- It answers complaints and offered to fix the one we examined. SuperFin replied publicly to every negative review on its Trustpilot profile and asked the locked-out client to send his account number so access could be restored. A pure exit scam does not usually do that.
- Offshore is not the same as fraudulent. We tested whether this is a regional arm of a licensed group, whether the predecessor's Belize licence was transferred across, and whether a recently granted licence might not be published yet. None of those held. The Belize licence is recorded as no longer authorised, no licensed parent exists, and the Australian company has been registered for 17 months with no licence to be waiting on. We also checked for a name collision: ASIC lists 15 unrelated Australian businesses containing 'superfin', and a separate unrelated firm uses superfin.al. None of their records were used here.
- Some clients report being paid. Positive accounts from 2025 and 2026 describe fast deposits and withdrawals arriving in 10 to 15 minutes. We note honestly that these posts read promotional, cluster in two countries and sit on unverified accounts, so we do not weigh them heavily in either direction.
What would change this
What we would need to see to revise the verdict.
These are the specific things that would move this verdict, in both directions.
- Towards safe. An Australian Financial Services licence number issued to SUPERFIN CORP PTY LTD, visible on ASIC's professional registers and covering dealing in derivatives for retail clients, would change the regulatory finding outright. So would a comparable licence from any real supervisor that actually authorises the entity holding client money.
- Towards safe. The site naming SuperForex openly as its predecessor, explaining what happened to those clients, and either dropping the '12 years' and 'Since 2013' claims or attributing them to that predecessor. Honest lineage would remove the age and awards findings entirely.
- Towards safe. Evidence that legacy SuperForex balances were honoured, such as several independent clients confirming they recovered funds after the migration, would withdraw the fund integrity finding.
- Towards safe. A documented severance from the warned operation: different beneficial owners, a different corporate chain and no shared infrastructure, stated with evidence. The predecessor's warnings would then stop counting against SuperFin.
- Towards worse. A warning or alert from any regulator naming superfin.global or superfinfx.com, or an enforcement action against any of the three SuperFin entities, would take this to a confirmed verdict.
- Towards worse. A cluster of independent, specific reports of withdrawals refused or balances removed under the SuperFin brand, or any credible report of a demand for a tax, fee or further deposit before funds are released.
Check it yourself
Official registers and warning lists. Verify every claim first-hand.
ASIC company register: SUPERFIN CORP PTY LTD, ACN 687 282 499
ASIC's own record: a proprietary company registered 21 May 2025, which is a company registration and not a financial services licence.
ASIC Professional Registers Search
Where an Australian Financial Services licence would appear. Search the company name or ACN 687 282 499.
IOSCO I-SCAN warnings for SuperForex
The global index of regulators' alert lists, showing the New Zealand FMA, Spanish CNMV and Japanese FSA entries for the predecessor brand.
Japan FSA list of unregistered financial instruments operators
Lists Finateqs Corp, service name SuperForex, for soliciting over the counter derivatives trading online without registration.
FinCEN MSB Registrant Search
Search the legal name Superfin. FinCEN states that being listed is not a recommendation, certification of legitimacy or endorsement.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines FSA Entity Name Search
The Saint Vincent company register. The authority does not license or supervise forex brokers, so a number from it is not a trading licence.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines FSA investor alerts
The authority's own warning page. Nothing connected to SuperFin appears on it.
SuperFin reviews on Trustpilot
Per domain review page, including the client account locked out after the rebrand and the company's reply.
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers about this broker’s safety.
Is SuperFin a scam?
We rate SuperFin a likely scam at 81 percent risk. It takes retail deposits with no financial services licence from any regulator, it advertises an ASIC licence that does not exist, and it is the continuation of SuperForex, an operation that regulators in Japan, New Zealand and Spain warned about in 2024. We stop short of confirmed because no regulator has yet warned about SuperFin itself and the trading platform is real.
Is SuperFin a fraud?
No regulator or court has made a finding of fraud against SuperFin, so we do not state that as fact. What we can state is that we assess the risk of fraud as high. The reasons are specific: a false claim of ASIC regulation, an advertised 12 year history on domains registered in February 2025, and clients of the predecessor brand reporting that they were locked out of balances that still existed.
Is SuperFin regulated by ASIC?
No. The site displays an ASIC logo and the words 'REGULATED BY ASIC' next to 'license number (ACN) 687 282 499'. An ACN is an Australian Company Number. ASIC's company register shows it belongs to SUPERFIN CORP PTY LTD, a proprietary company registered on 21 May 2025. ASIC issues company numbers as the companies registrar. Running a brokerage requires an Australian Financial Services licence, and SuperFin publishes no such number anywhere.
Does SuperFin hold any financial licence at all?
No. We found three pieces of paperwork and not one of them is a financial services licence: a Saint Vincent company registration numbered 1671 CTD 2024, the Australian company number above, and a United States money services business registration filed with FinCEN in November 2025. A company registration and an anti money laundering filing give you no protection as a trading client.
Can I withdraw my money from SuperFin?
Some clients report withdrawals arriving within 10 to 15 minutes. Others report the opposite. A trader who held an account under the predecessor brand reported that his login stopped working after the rebrand and support said it had no access to old accounts, while his MetaTrader account and funds remained live on the server. If you hold a balance, request it in writing now and keep records of everything.
Is my money safe with SuperFin?
There is no supervisor standing behind it. The funds security page says client money is stored separately from company funds and the homepage advertises 100 percent funds security, but no regulator licenses the company that holds your money, so no one audits that separation and there is no compensation scheme if the money is gone. Those statements are the firm's own word.
Is SuperFin the same company as SuperForex?
Yes, it is the same operation under a new name. SuperForex told clients in September 2024 that it would stop accepting new customers and discontinue services for existing ones. Its site then went dark, and SuperFin's domains were registered on 4 February 2025. SuperFin reuses SuperForex's awards list and page title format, and SuperFin confirmed the rebrand in writing in a public reply, apologising for the transition and saying the database migration required manual account linking.
How old is SuperFin really?
About 18 months as this brand. Both superfin.global and superfinfx.com were registered on 4 February 2025, and the Australian company was registered on 21 May 2025. The '12 years of operation' and 'Since 2013' on the site refer to SuperForex, which the site never names. The lineage is real, but the entity you would contract with is new and the predecessor is the one regulators warned about.
What is the Saint Vincent licence number 1671 CTD 2024 worth?
Nothing as a trading licence. It is a company registration number from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines company register. The Saint Vincent FSA does not license or supervise forex and CFD brokers at all, so no broker can truthfully describe a Saint Vincent number as financial regulation. The registered address, Suite 305 Griffith Corporate Centre in Kingstown, is a mass registration office used by many offshore brokers.
What does SuperFin's FinCEN registration mean?
Very little, and FinCEN says so itself. A money services business registration is a self filed anti money laundering notification under the Bank Secrecy Act. FinCEN's own register page states that inclusion is not a recommendation, certification of legitimacy or endorsement by any government agency, and that firms claiming FinCEN has approved or endorsed them are making a false claim that may be part of a scam. SuperFin's homepage says it is globally regulated in jurisdictions including FinCEN.
Is SuperFin a clone of another broker?
No. A clone wears another company's licence number, name or address. SuperFin's registrations are genuinely its own and resolve to companies bearing its own name. The problem is different: it presents company registrations as financial regulation, and it claims a predecessor's 12 year history as its own without naming that predecessor.
I had a SuperForex account and cannot log in. What should I do?
Your old MetaTrader credentials may still reach a live account on the operator's server, as one client found. Log in if you can, screenshot the balance and the account number, then request a full withdrawal in writing and keep every reply. If the firm will not release the funds, report it to the police and the financial regulator where you live, and to your bank or card issuer if you funded by card.
What should I check before depositing with any broker?
Four things. Find the licence number, then look it up on the regulator's own register rather than trusting a badge on the site. Confirm the licence covers dealing in derivatives for retail clients, not just company registration or advice. Check the licence is held by the same company named in the terms you are signing. And check the domain's registration date against any claim about years in business.
What do I do if I have already lost money with SuperFin?
Gather your evidence first: deposit receipts, account statements, the MetaTrader account number and all support correspondence. Ask your bank or card issuer about a chargeback, since card payments have time limits. Report it to the police and to the financial regulator in your own country. Do not pay anyone who promises to recover your funds for an upfront fee, including the recovery service promoted in a review on SuperFin's own Trustpilot page. Charging victims again is a standard follow-up scam.
What we recommend
The practical takeaway from everything above.
Our advice for anyone considering SuperFin, or already holding an account.
- Do not deposit. No regulator supervises the company that would hold your money, so there is no compensation scheme, no ombudsman and no supervisor to escalate to if a withdrawal is refused. The promise that client funds are kept separate is the firm's own word and nothing more.
- Do not rely on the ASIC badge. Check it yourself. Search ACN 687 282 499 on ASIC's company register and you will see a company registration from May 2025. Then search the company name on ASIC's professional registers, which is where a financial services licence would appear.
- If you hold a balance, withdraw it now and keep records. Request a full withdrawal, screenshot the request, the account statement and every support exchange, and keep your MetaTrader account number and deposit receipts.
- Avoid the deposit bonuses. Accepting the 30 percent bonus ties your own capital to a turnover requirement most retail accounts will never clear, and touching that capital before you clear it forfeits the credit.
- If you were a SuperForex client who cannot log in, your old MetaTrader credentials may still reach a live account. Record what you see, request the balance in writing, and keep the correspondence.
- Ignore anyone offering to recover your money for a fee. One review on SuperFin's own profile promotes a named recovery service. Fund recovery agents that charge upfront are a standard follow-up scam aimed at people who have already lost money. Report losses to your bank or card issuer and to the police or financial regulator where you live.
- If you want leverage on CFDs, use a broker licensed where you live, and verify the licence number on that regulator's own register before you send any money.
This is an independent assessment of risk, not a legal ruling. Scores and verdicts follow the Wikilix broker-safety methodology and can change as new evidence appears. Review scores are treated with caution when a broker’s reviews look manipulated. Last reviewed October 9, 2026. If any detail here is out of date or incorrect, or you represent this broker, please contact us.
What traders say about SuperFin
Comments on SuperFin are posted on its profile
Nobody has commented on SuperFin yet. If you have traded with them, your experience helps the next reader decide.
Write the first comment