T. Rowe Price says it owes you nothing at all for its websites. If a court refuses that, section 14 of the Terms of Use sets a fallback ceiling of $100 on everything it could ever owe you.
Why this matters
You read your balance, prices and performance on those pages. The first clause rules out damages of any kind, direct ones included. The $100 figure is what is left if a court strikes the first clause down.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.$100The figure this clause puts a number on, taken from the broker's own words.
NEITHER T. ROWE PRICE NOR ANY THIRD-PARTY CONTENT PROVIDER WILL BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT OR OTHERWISE.
Firms authorised by the FCA may not use a contract term to exclude or restrict a duty or a liability they owe to a client under the regulatory rules. These Terms of Use rule out damages of any kind and cap every claim about the websites at $100, while saying the cap may not apply where local law refuses it.
T. Rowe Price is not licensed by this regulator, so this is a comparison of practice, not a finding of any breach.
- Worse together with Exhibit 6Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.The same document says nobody has to check whether an instruction came from you, and caps what you can recover when it did not.

What traders say about T. Rowe Price
Comments on T. Rowe Price are posted on its profile
Nobody has commented on T. Rowe Price yet. If you have traded with them, your experience helps the next reader decide.
Write the first comment