Risk scorecard
Each area is scored 0 (clean) to 10 (worst). Higher means more risk.
Regulation
7/10 · HighTakes client deposits with no financial licence anywhere; presents a Saint Lucia IBC company registration as regulation and is absent from the FCA register.
Identity & transparency
6/10 · HighEntities are named and the UK company is verifiable, but the UK address is a mass-registration mail drop, two different Saint Lucia addresses appear, ownership is undisclosed and listed contacts fail.
Withdrawals & conduct
8/10 · CriticalRepeated fund-integrity complaints across platforms with specific amounts, dates and an MT5 account number: withdrawals refused and profits deleted on a vague scalping pretext.
Reputation
7/10 · HighMultiple independent sources rate it unregulated or a scam; a sustained withdrawal-complaint stream, plus documented pressure to remove negative reviews.
Website claims
7/10 · HighPresents a company registration as regulation, asserts client protection it cannot provide, and makes grandiose world's-largest and 29-billion-a-day claims.
Operational history
5/10 · ModerateAbout two years old: the domain was for sale in 2022 and reused from around 2024, with companies dating to 2023 and 2024; no verified track record.
Who they are
A quick desk file on the company behind the brand.
- Brand: Vortex FX
- Legal entity: Vortex FX LTD, a Saint Lucia IBC (No. 2023-00517); payments are routed through VortexFx UK Limited (UK company No. 15620241)
- Registered: Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Saint Lucia. The site also prints a second, different Saint Lucia address at Choc Bay, Castries. UK address: 128 City Road, London EC1V 2NX
- Website: vortexfx.com (related sites vortexfx.money and vfxfx.com)
- Only 'licence': none. The broker presents its Saint Lucia company registration as its regulation
- Offers: Forex and CFDs on MetaTrader 5, plus virtual and physical 'crypto cards'
- Not accepted: United States, Israel, New Zealand, Iran, North Korea
- Age claim: no founding year is stated; the evidence points to an operation about two years old
Regulation
Who really oversees this broker, and what each licence is worth to you.
Proof of regulation on an official register: No
We could not confirm this broker on any genuine regulator’s register.
Licences the broker publishes
Registry of International Business Companies, Partnerships & Trusts (Saint Lucia)
UK Companies House (company registration)
Why we reached this verdict
How the evidence adds up.
Four findings line up, and together they point the same way.
- It is not regulated, anywhere. The firm names a Saint Lucia IBC (No. 2023-00517) and a UK company (No. 15620241). Neither is a financial licence. Saint Lucia does not license retail forex brokers, and a UK company registration is not FCA authorisation. The Financial Services Register returns no match for VortexFx, so clients have no ombudsman and no compensation scheme.
- Clients report that they cannot get their money out. On Trustpilot and on an independent complaints site, different people describe the same sequence: a deposit, then a withdrawal that is refused or stalled for months, and in several cases profits deleted after a sudden accusation of scalping that the broker never clearly defines. The reports carry specific amounts (for example 2,600, 11,400 and 28,073.60 US dollars), dates, and an MT5 account number (302826). One trader says the firm offered to help only if the negative review was taken down.
- The business presents paperwork as protection. The page the broker titles Regulation contains no regulator and no licence number, only the IBC registration, yet it tells clients they are 'protected by rigorous compliance protocols' and that the firm 'adheres to the Securities Act'. The homepage claims it is 'among the world's largest Forex CFD providers' handling '29 billion USD' in trades a day, which is not credible for an unregulated two-year-old operation.
- The shell is thin. The web address was openly for sale as recently as 2022 and the broker only appears on it from around 2024. The UK company sits at a City Road address used by hundreds of registrations. The site even prints two different Saint Lucia addresses for the same company.
We did not find a regulator warning naming this exact website, and no court has ruled, so we stop at likely rather than confirmed. We assess the risk of fraud as high.
Evidence ledger
Every finding, with its source and how strongly it points.
E1No financial licence in any jurisdiction. The FCA register returns no match for VortexFx, and the firm holds only a Saint Lucia IBC company registration (2023-00517) and a UK company (15620241), neither of which is forex regulation.
E2A repeated fund-integrity pattern across Trustpilot and an independent complaints site: deposits taken, withdrawals refused or stalled for months, and profits deleted after a vague scalping accusation, with specific amounts (2,600, 11,400 and 28,073.60 US dollars), dates and MT5 account 302826.
StrongTrustpilotE3The broker's own Regulation page names no regulator and no licence number, only its Saint Lucia IBC registration, yet claims clients are protected by rigorous compliance protocols and that the firm adheres to the Securities Act.
StrongVortex FX websiteE4A published complaint describing 11,400 US dollars in profit deleted and a withdrawal refused on MT5 account 302826, including an offer to help only if the negative review was removed.
ModerateBrokersViewE5VortexFx UK Limited is registered at 128 City Road, London, a mail-forwarding address used by hundreds of companies, and is incorporated only on 6 April 2024; it is not FCA authorised.
ModerateUK Companies HouseE6The web address vortexfx.com was openly offered for sale as recently as 2022 and served no broker content until around 2024, so its older registration does not reflect a long-established business.
E7The homepage markets the firm as among the world's largest Forex CFD providers, handling 29 billion US dollars a day and 100,000 trades a day, claims not credible for an unregulated operation about two years old.
ModerateVortex FX websiteE8The broker prints two different Saint Lucia registered addresses for the same company (Rodney Bay on the footer, Choc Bay in Castries on the Regulation page).
E9The broker genuinely runs a MetaTrader 5 server (VortexFX-Main) and some reviewers report normal trading, so a real trading product exists even though it is unregulated.
E10The named legal entities exist: VortexFx UK Limited is a live record on UK Companies House, so this is not a wholly anonymous front.
The other side
The strongest case in this broker’s favour.
In fairness, some things cut the other way, and we weighed them.
- The companies are real and partly checkable. VortexFx UK Limited genuinely exists on UK Companies House, and the Saint Lucia IBC number is disclosed openly. This is not a faceless operation with no named entity at all.
- There is a real trading product. The broker runs a genuine MetaTrader 5 server (VortexFX-Main), and a share of reviewers describe normal trading and some successful withdrawals.
- The firm does engage. It has claimed its review profile and replies to most negative reviews, rather than vanishing completely.
- Offshore and weakly regulated is not the same as fraud. Plenty of brokers operate from small jurisdictions. On its own, a Saint Lucia base would be a risk note, not a verdict.
These points lower the temperature, but they do not answer the core problem: an unlicensed firm that holds client money, and a repeated, specific pattern of people not getting it back.
What would change this
What we would need to see to revise the verdict.
We would revisit this view if the facts changed.
- A genuine licence from a recognised regulator (for example the FCA, CySEC, ASIC or the FSA Seychelles), verifiable on that regulator's own register under this company and this website, would move the regulation picture sharply.
- A clear, documented run of paid-out withdrawals, with the current scalping-based profit deletions stopping, would ease the conduct concern.
- Independent confirmation that client funds are genuinely segregated and protected, rather than merely asserted, would help.
Equally, a regulator warning that named vortexfx.com, or a confirmed enforcement action, would push this from likely toward confirmed.
Check it yourself
Official registers and warning lists. Verify every claim first-hand.
FCA Financial Services Register (search: VortexFx)
Confirm Vortex FX and its UK company are not FCA authorised.
UK Companies House: VortexFx UK Limited
A company registration (6 April 2024), not a financial licence.
Trustpilot reviews for vortexfx.com
Read client reviews, including the withdrawal complaints.
Vortex FX 'Regulation' page
See what the broker itself offers as proof of regulation.
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers about this broker’s safety.
Is Vortex FX a scam?
We assess Vortex FX as a likely scam. It takes deposits without any financial licence, and clients repeatedly report that withdrawals are refused and profits are deleted. No regulator or court has formally ruled, so we stop short of calling it a proven scam, but the risk is high.
Is Vortex FX a fraud?
We did not find a regulator warning or court ruling that names vortexfx.com, so we do not state as fact that it commits fraud. What we can say is that clients describe deposits taken and withdrawals then refused, and we assess the risk of fraud as high.
Is Vortex FX regulated?
No. It holds only a Saint Lucia company (IBC) registration and a UK company registration, neither of which is a financial licence. It is not on the UK FCA register, and Saint Lucia does not license retail forex brokers.
Can I withdraw my money from Vortex FX?
Many clients report that they cannot. Common complaints are withdrawals stalled for months, accounts restricted, and profits deleted after a sudden scalping accusation. If you have a balance, request it now and keep records.
Is my money safe with Vortex FX?
There is no regulatory safety net. With no licence, there is no ombudsman and no compensation scheme, so if funds go missing you have little recourse. The complaint record suggests real risk to deposits.
Who is behind Vortex FX?
The trading entity is Vortex FX LTD, a Saint Lucia IBC (No. 2023-00517). A separate UK company, VortexFx UK Limited (No. 15620241), handles payments. The individual owners are not disclosed on the site.
How old is Vortex FX?
The operation is about two years old. The web address was offered for sale as recently as 2022, the current broker appears from around 2024, and the companies date from 2023 and 2024. It is not a long-established firm.
Is VortexFx UK Limited FCA regulated?
No. It is only registered at Companies House as a UK company. A company registration is not FCA authorisation, and the firm does not appear on the FCA Financial Services Register, so it cannot lawfully provide regulated investment services in the UK.
Is the Saint Lucia IBC a trading licence?
No. An International Business Company registration is a corporate record, not financial regulation. Saint Lucia does not supervise forex or CFD brokers through it, so it gives clients no protection.
Is Vortex FX a clone of another broker?
We found no evidence that it impersonates a specific regulated firm. It uses its own brand and its own entities. The concern here is unregulated operation and withdrawal problems, not cloning.
What should I do if I was scammed by Vortex FX?
Gather your records (amounts, dates, ticket numbers, screenshots). If you paid by card or e-wallet, ask about a chargeback. Report it to your local financial regulator and police. Do not pay anyone who offers to recover your funds for an upfront fee, as that is usually a second scam.
What should I check before depositing with any broker?
Confirm the licence number on the regulator's own register, and check that the register lists the same company and website. Prefer brokers regulated by a major authority such as the FCA, ASIC or CySEC, and be cautious of grand claims, pressure to deposit, and withdrawal rules that let the firm delete profits.
What we recommend
The practical takeaway from everything above.
Our advice is cautious and practical.
- Do not deposit new money with Vortex FX. An unregulated broker leaves you with no ombudsman and no compensation scheme if funds go missing.
- If you already have a balance, request a full withdrawal now and keep written records (amounts, dates, ticket numbers, screenshots).
- If a withdrawal is refused or you are asked to pay a fee, tax or 'penalty' to release funds, treat that as a serious warning sign and do not pay it.
- If you deposited by card or e-wallet, ask your bank or provider about a chargeback, and report the matter to your local financial regulator or police.
- Be wary of anyone who contacts you offering to 'recover' your money for an upfront fee. Recovery-fee offers are a common second scam.
This is an independent assessment of risk, not a legal ruling. Scores and verdicts follow the Wikilix broker-safety methodology and can change as new evidence appears. Review scores are treated with caution when a broker’s reviews look manipulated. Last reviewed October 5, 2026. If any detail here is out of date or incorrect, or you represent this broker, please contact us.
What traders say about Vortex FX
Comments on Vortex FX are posted on its profile
Nobody has commented on Vortex FX yet. If you have traded with them, your experience helps the next reader decide.
Write the first comment