Wikilix - Broker Reviews & Analysis

Your trusted platform for comprehensive broker reviews, analysis, and trading education. Making informed trading decisions through transparency and community insights.

Trusted by 50,000+ traders worldwide

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Regulators
  • Education
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy

Resources

  • All Brokers
  • Top Brokers
  • Scam Alerts
  • News
  • Spread Meter

Connect With Us

[email protected]
[email protected]
Secure & Encrypted
Global Broker Coverage

Broker categories

  • Tier 1 regulated
  • Tier 2 regulated
  • Tier 3 regulated
  • Tier 4 regulated
  • Onshore brokers
  • Offshore brokers
  • Unregulated brokers
  • Brokers by country
  • Broker rankings
© 2026 Wikilix. All Rights Reserved.

Trading involves risk. Please consider your investment objectives and risk tolerance before trading.

Wikilix
  • Home
  • Broker
  • Rankings
  • Regulators
  • Learn
  • Insights
  • Spread Meter
  • Prop Firms
Wikilix
Wikilix

Browse

  • Home
  • Learn
  • Spread Meter

Follow us

  1. Home
  2. Brokers
  3. Walfiner
  4. Is Walfiner a scam?

Independent safety report

Is Walfiner a scam?

Likely scamMEDIUM confidence
Updated August 29, 2026
Unlicensed broker, withdrawal denial and apparent exit

Walfiner is very likely a scam. We put the risk at 81%. It took client deposits without a financial licence from any regulator, clients reported withdrawals that were declared paid but never arrived, and the website has since gone dark.

  • We searched the US National Futures Association register on 29 August 2026. There is no record of Walfiner, and the register states such a firm has never been registered with the CFTC.
  • Saint Lucia, where the company says it is registered, does not license forex brokers at all. A company registration there is not financial regulation.
  • The Saint Lucia public company registry returned no record for either the name Walfiner or the registration number 2023-00518.
  • Clients on two review platforms describe the same failure between March and June 2025: a withdrawal marked complete by the broker that the client's bank never received.
  • The site walfiner.com no longer responds. The domain still resolves, but the server accepts no connections, and Trustpilot has recorded no reviews at all in the last twelve months.
Full broker profileOfficial site

Safety verdict

Critical risk
0%Scam risk
2.0/5Safety rating 2 out of 5
Wikilix safety rating
medium
Confidence
At a glance
Proof of regulationNot found
Clone of another firmNo
TypeUnlicensed broker, withdrawal denial and apparent exit
Evidence items11
  • VerdictReading now
  • Risk scorecard
  • Who they are
  • Regulation
  • Why this verdict
  • Evidence
  • The other side
  • What would change
  • Check it yourself
  • FAQ
  • What we recommend
Report progress
Total sections11
Read1
VerdictRisk scorecardWho they areRegulationWhy this verdict

Risk scorecard

Each area is scored 0 (clean) to 10 (worst). Higher means more risk.

Worst area: Critical
SeverityLowModerateHighCritical

Regulation

9/10 · Critical

No licence on any register while taking client deposits, absent from the NFA register, and registered in a jurisdiction that issues no forex licences.

Identity & transparency

8/10 · Critical

Named entity and Dubai address are published but neither the company nor its registration number appears on the Saint Lucia registry, and the operators have since gone silent.

Withdrawals & conduct

8/10 · Critical

Fund-integrity complaints on two platforms clustered in March to June 2025, all describing a withdrawal declared paid that never reached the client's bank.

Reputation

8/10 · Critical

2.5 of 5 on Trustpilot with 73% one-star and 1.3 of 5 on reviews.io, unanswered by the company, with two apparently planted five-star reviews.

Website claims

7/10 · High

Reported to have presented itself as NFA overseen when it has never been registered, alongside a 3,000 dollar bonus and 1:500 leverage marketing; we could not read the pages ourselves.

Operational history

8/10 · Critical

At most 2 years 10 months old on the domain, company undatable, and the operation is now abandoned with clients still complaining.

Who they are

A quick desk file on the company behind the brand.

  • Brand: Walfiner
  • Legal entity: Walfiner.LTD
  • Registered: Saint Lucia, registration number given as 2023-00518. We could not confirm this on the public registry.
  • Office address published: Level 03, Boulevard Plaza Tower One, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Boulevard, Downtown Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • Contact number published: +971 4 455 8797
  • Website: walfiner.com, registered 11 October 2023, currently offline
  • Only licence: None. No financial regulator anywhere lists this firm.
  • Offers: Forex, indices, energy, metals and crypto CFDs on MT5 and cTrader, leverage up to 1:500, minimum deposit 15 US dollars, a bonus of up to 3,000 US dollars
  • Not accepted: No restricted-country list could be read, because the site is no longer available
  • Age claim: The company is described as established in 2023, which matches the domain age. We found no inflated history claim.
The Saint Lucia Registry of Companies returns no record for the name Walfiner, captured 29 August 2026.
The Saint Lucia Registry of Companies returns no record for the claimed registration number 2023-00518.

Regulation

Who really oversees this broker, and what each licence is worth to you.

No proof found

Proof of regulation on an official register: No

We could not confirm this broker on any genuine regulator’s register.

Licences the broker publishes

National Futures Association

UnverifiedTier 1
The US self-regulatory body for futures and retail forex, working under the CFTC. Offering retail forex to US residents requires registration here, and the register is public and searchable.
Protection: Strong in principle, with arbitration and strict capital rules, but none of it applies because this firm is not a member.Official register

Registry of Companies and Intellectual Property, Saint Lucia

UnverifiedNot a forex licence
A company registry, not a financial regulator. Saint Lucia does not license or supervise forex brokers, so a registration here says only that a company was formed. It carries no oversight of client money.
Protection: None. No capital requirements, no segregation of client funds, no compensation scheme and no ombudsman.Official register

Why we reached this verdict

How the evidence adds up.

Three things decided this, and none of them depends on the broker's marketing.

  • No licence, anywhere. We searched the National Futures Association register by firm name on 29 August 2026 and it returned zero results, with the register's own note that such a firm has never been registered with the CFTC. This matters because a third-party broker directory records that Walfiner presented itself as overseen by that body. Saint Lucia, the stated place of registration, issues no forex licences at all, so nothing there could substitute.
  • Clients report money that did not come back. Between March and June 2025, reviewers on Trustpilot and on reviews.io describe the same mechanism: a withdrawal the company insisted had been sent, which the client's bank confirmed never arrived. Others put it more bluntly and call the operation a thief. That is a fund-integrity pattern, not a complaint about spreads or support.
  • The operation then disappeared. The domain still resolves, but the server no longer accepts connections. Trustpilot has recorded no review of any kind in the past twelve months. One reviewer in June 2025 wrote that the company had deleted its entire Telegram channel and changed its name. A business that stops answering the door immediately after a run of withdrawal complaints is the pattern of an exit, not of a quiet retirement.

We want to be straight about two limits. The web archive was unavailable throughout this run, so we could not read Walfiner's own pages as they last stood, and we could not photograph its licence wording ourselves. And several of the reviews.io complaints are wrapped in advertising for fund-recovery firms, which is a known way of manufacturing complaints, so we discounted their detail and leaned on the pattern rather than the specifics. The verdict rests on the register searches and the abandoned site, which do not depend on any review being genuine.

The track record figure is an upper bound. The domain is 2 years and 10 months old, and we could not date the company on any registry, so the operation is at most that old and may be younger.

Evidence ledger

Every finding, with its source and how strongly it points.

9 against1 in favour
  • E1The US National Futures Association register returns zero results for Walfiner, with the register's own note that such a firm is not and has not been registered with the CFTC.

    StrongNFA BASIC register, searched by firm name on 29 August 2026
  • E2The Saint Lucia public company registry holds no record for the name Walfiner.

    ModerateRegistry of Companies and Intellectual Property, Saint Lucia
  • E3The same Saint Lucia registry holds no record for the claimed registration number 2023-00518.

    ModerateRegistry of Companies and Intellectual Property, Saint Lucia
  • E4Trustpilot records 2.5 out of 5 from 11 reviews, 73% of them one star, and no reviews at all in the last twelve months. Complaints dated April to June 2025 describe withdrawal problems and call the operator a thief, and one states the company deleted its Telegram channel and changed its name.

    StrongTrustpilot, per-domain page for walfiner.com
  • E5Reviews.io records 1.3 out of 5 from 24 reviews with 8% recommending. Two reviews dated 23 and 30 June 2025 describe waiting two weeks for a withdrawal that the company said was completed while the client's bank confirmed nothing was ever received.

    ModerateReviews.io company page for walfiner.com
  • E6The domain walfiner.com was created on 11 October 2023 and is registered through PDR Ltd with Cloudflare nameservers, making the operation about two years and ten months old.

    ModerateVerisign registry record for walfiner.com
  • E7The domain still resolves to the address 78.159.113.48, but the server no longer accepts connections, so the trading site is effectively gone while the registration remains alive until 2027.

    StrongPublic DNS resolution for walfiner.com, checked 29 August 2026
  • E8The hosting address serves only generic control-panel hostnames and no other broker brands, so there is no sign this site sat inside a wider network of related operations.

    WeakReverse address lookup for 78.159.113.48
  • E9An independent broker review site records Walfiner as unregulated and suspected inactive, notes that Saint Lucia does not license forex trading, and concludes the operation appears to be a scam.

    ModerateBrokersView broker profile for Walfiner
  • E10The same review site answered a public question about Walfiner in September 2024 by stating it believed the broker to be a scam, citing offshore registration and an unverified UAE presence.

    WeakBrokersView questions and answers thread
  • E11A sweep of the international alert network and the UK, US, Italian, German, Belgian and Swiss warning lists found no entry naming Walfiner or its domain, so no authority has published a finding against it.

    WeakWarning-list sweep across regulator domains, 29 August 2026
Reviews.io shows 1.3 out of 5 across 24 reviews of walfiner.com, with withdrawal complaints dated June 2025.
An independent broker review site records Walfiner as unregulated and suspected inactive.
A public question thread from September 2024 in which the review site states it believes Walfiner to be a scam.

The other side

The strongest case in this broker’s favour.

The fair case for Walfiner, and what we did to test it.

  • An offshore licence is not automatically fraud. Hundreds of real brokers work under weak offshore regimes. But Walfiner does not have even that. We found no licence on any register, weak or strong.
  • A dead website can just mean a failed business. This was the strongest innocent explanation and we took it seriously. What defeats it is the timing: the complaints about unpaid withdrawals come immediately before the site goes quiet, rather than tapering off the way a wind-down does.
  • Some of the complaints are not trustworthy. That is true, and it cuts in Walfiner's favour. Several reviews exist mainly to advertise recovery services, and two of them use near-identical wording. We set their detail aside.
  • There are positive reviews. Two five-star Trustpilot reviews call the broker safe and reliable, and one user comment praises its execution. Both Trustpilot accounts have posted exactly one review in their lifetime and offer only generic praise, which is the usual shape of planted feedback rather than evidence of happy clients.
  • No regulator has named it. We swept the international alert networks and the UK, US, Italian, German, Belgian and Swiss warning lists and found no entry for Walfiner or its domain. No authority has published a finding against this firm, and we have not treated its absence as a hit.
  • It is not impersonating anyone. Walfiner is a coined name on its own domain. We found no real company whose identity, licence number or address it borrowed, so nobody else's reputation is caught up in this.

What would change this

What we would need to see to revise the verdict.

Concrete things that would move this verdict.

  • A current entry for Walfiner.LTD on the register of any real financial regulator, showing a dealing licence in force, would drop the regulation score sharply and reopen the whole assessment.
  • A Saint Lucia registry extract showing company 2023-00518 in good standing, with a matching address, would settle the corporate side and raise our confidence in who is behind it.
  • Evidence that the withdrawals were eventually paid, such as bank confirmations from the clients who complained, would remove the most serious finding.
  • The site returning with the same legal entity, the same client accounts and an orderly explanation of the outage would argue against an exit and for an ordinary business interruption.
  • Conversely, a regulator warning naming walfiner.com, or a documented demand for an extra payment before releasing funds, would push this to a confirmed scam.
  • Identifying the successor brand the June 2025 reviewer referred to, and tying it to the same people or infrastructure, would carry this history onto that new name.

Check it yourself

Official registers and warning lists. Verify every claim first-hand.

5 sources

NFA BASIC register (search Firm Name: Walfiner)

The US futures register. Searching Walfiner here returns no results.

Saint Lucia Registry of Companies, name search

The public company register. It holds no record under this name.

Saint Lucia Registry of Companies, number search

The same register searched by the claimed registration number, also with no record.

Trustpilot reviews for walfiner.com

Per-domain review page showing the rating and the complaint dates.

Domain registration record for walfiner.com

Registry record confirming the domain was created on 11 October 2023.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about this broker’s safety.

13 questions
Is Walfiner a scam?

In our assessment it very likely is, and we rate the risk at 81%. It took deposits without a licence from any financial regulator, clients reported withdrawals that were never actually paid, and the website has since stopped responding altogether.

Is Walfiner regulated?

No. We found no licence on any regulator's register. We searched the US National Futures Association register on 29 August 2026 and there is no record of the firm. Saint Lucia, where it says it is registered, does not license forex brokers at all.

Walfiner said it was overseen by the National Futures Association. Was that true?

No. The NFA register returned zero results for Walfiner and states that such a firm has never been registered with the CFTC. Any claim of NFA oversight was false.

Does a Saint Lucia registration protect my money?

No. Registering a company in Saint Lucia is a corporate formality, roughly like registering a business name. It involves no supervision of client funds, no capital requirements and no compensation scheme. It is not a forex licence.

Can I still withdraw my money from Walfiner?

The website is offline and no longer accepts connections, so there is no working way to place a withdrawal request. If you hold a balance, your realistic routes are a chargeback or payment recall through your bank and a report to your national authorities.

Why is the Walfiner website down?

The domain still exists but the server no longer answers. It went quiet after a run of withdrawal complaints in the first half of 2025. One client wrote in June 2025 that the company had deleted its Telegram channel and changed its name.

How old was Walfiner?

The domain walfiner.com was registered on 11 October 2023, which makes it about two years and ten months old. We could not date the company on any registry, so that figure is an upper bound and the operation may be younger.

Is Walfiner a clone of another broker?

No. We found no evidence that it copied another company's name, licence number or registered address. It traded under its own coined brand on its own domain, so this is not an impersonation case.

Has any regulator issued a warning about Walfiner?

Not that we could find. We checked the international alert network and the UK, US, Italian, German, Belgian and Swiss warning lists and found no entry. Warning lists often lag, so this is not a clean bill of health.

What do the reviews actually say?

Trustpilot shows 2.5 out of 5 across 11 reviews, with 73% at one star and none in the last twelve months. Reviews.io shows 1.3 out of 5 across 24 reviews with only 8% recommending. The recurring theme is a withdrawal the company said it had sent that the client's bank never received.

Can I trust the positive reviews of Walfiner?

We would not lean on them. The two five-star Trustpilot reviews come from accounts that have written exactly one review ever and offer only generic praise, which is the standard pattern for planted feedback rather than genuine customers.

Someone offered to recover my funds from Walfiner. Should I pay them?

No. Several reviews of this broker exist mainly to advertise recovery firms, and paying an upfront fee to a recovery agent is a common follow-up scam aimed at people who have already lost money. Work through your bank and the authorities instead, which costs nothing.

What should I check before depositing with any broker?

Take the licence number from the broker's own site and type it into the regulator's public register yourself. Confirm the entity named on the register is the same one that will hold your money, check the licence permits dealing rather than only advice, and check how old the domain is.

What we recommend

The practical takeaway from everything above.

Our advice

If you have money with Walfiner, or are being invited to deposit, treat this as urgent.

  • Do not send any further funds, and be especially wary of anyone asking for a fee, tax or verification payment to release a balance. That request is itself the scam.
  • If you deposited by card or bank transfer, contact your bank or card issuer now and ask about a chargeback or a payment recall. Two clients reported that their bank had no record of any incoming payment despite the company saying it had been sent, so your bank's own trace is worth requesting.
  • Gather your evidence while you still can: account statements, deposit receipts, chat logs and the wallet addresses or bank details you paid to.
  • Report it to the financial regulator and the police in the country you live in. Because the firm holds no licence, there is no ombudsman or compensation scheme to fall back on.
  • Ignore anyone who contacts you offering to recover your funds for an upfront fee. Several reviews of this broker are themselves adverts for such services, and they are a second scam aimed at the same victims.
  • Before using any replacement broker, check its licence number directly on the regulator's own register rather than trusting a badge on its website.

This is an independent assessment of risk, not a legal ruling. Scores and verdicts follow the Wikilix broker-safety methodology and can change as new evidence appears. Review scores are treated with caution when a broker’s reviews look manipulated. Last reviewed August 29, 2026. If any detail here is out of date or incorrect, or you represent this broker, please contact us.