MondFx spreads
MondFx's typical spread on EURUSD is 0.92 pips. We read every price the broker sends and weight each spread by how long it actually held — across 10 instruments and 59.7M quotes so far.
MondFx live spreads
MondFx's typical spread on EURUSD is 0.92 pips, measured on a real trading account. We read every price the broker sends and weight each spread by how long it actually held — across 10 instruments and 59.7M quotes so far.
- UsualThe median. Half the time the spread was tighter than this, half the time wider.
- 0.89 pips
- Bad momentsThe 95th percentile. One reading in twenty was worse than this — the moments that cost you.
- 1.02 pips
- Best seenThe tightest spread recorded on this instrument.
- 0.30 pips
- Worst seenThe widest spread recorded, usually at the daily rollover or around news.
- 9.60 pips
Spread over time
Tap an instrument to add it to the chart. Hover the lines for the exact reading at that moment.
Above 1.50 pips the scale compresses, so one rollover window does not flatten the rest. The widest reading in view is 8.47 pips.
| Instrument | TypicalThe average spread, weighted by how long each one actually held rather than by how many quotes were sent. Read every 10 minutes. | UsualThe median: half the readings were tighter than this, half were wider. | Bad momentsThe 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. | BestThe tightest reading recorded. | WorstThe widest reading recorded. Spreads usually widen at the daily rollover and around news. | QuotesHow many individual price updates from the broker these figures are built from. A bigger number means a steadier measurement. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EURUSDEURUSD. | 0.92 pips | 0.89 | 1.02The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 25, 21:30 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 8, 06:20 UTC. | 9.60Widest at Oct 25, 21:30 UTC. | 4MFrom 7411 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| GBPUSDGBPUSD. | 1.14 pips | 1.05 | 1.57The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 6, 21:30 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 11, 02:30 UTC. | 20.2Widest at Oct 6, 21:30 UTC. | 6.4MFrom 7483 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| USDJPYUSDJPY. | 1.15 pips | 1.09 | 1.48The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 4, 21:40 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 8, 08:10 UTC. | 17.7Widest at Oct 4, 21:40 UTC. | 6.3MFrom 7465 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| USDCHFUSDCHF. | 1.15 pips | 1.14 | 1.28The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Sep 7, 15:10 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 4, 23:00 UTC. | 27.8Widest at Sep 7, 15:10 UTC. | 3.2MFrom 7408 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| USDCADUSDCAD. | 1.05 pips | 1.02 | 1.23The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 8, 21:30 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 5, 11:40 UTC. | 15.6Widest at Oct 8, 21:30 UTC. | 3.6MFrom 7351 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| AUDUSDAUDUSD. | 0.96 pips | 0.92 | 1.08The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 18, 22:00 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 5, 06:50 UTC. | 12.4Widest at Oct 18, 22:00 UTC. | 3.5MFrom 7427 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| NZDUSDNZDUSD. | 1.01 pips | 0.97 | 1.16The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Sep 29, 21:40 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 7, 18:40 UTC. | 19.8Widest at Sep 29, 21:40 UTC. | 3MFrom 7402 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| EURGBPEURGBP. | 1.10 pips | 1.05 | 1.24The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Sep 14, 15:30 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 3, 11:30 UTC. | 14.7Widest at Sep 14, 15:30 UTC. | 4.1MFrom 7480 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| EURJPYEURJPY. | 1.59 pips | 1.50 | 1.85The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 4, 21:30 UTC. | 0.30Tightest at Sep 1, 05:50 UTC. | 37.3Widest at Oct 4, 21:30 UTC. | 8.5MFrom 7544 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
| XAUUSDXAUUSD. | 23.9 points | 24.1 | 25.0The 95th percentile — one reading in twenty was worse than this. Widest at Oct 15, 12:30 UTC. | 17.4Tightest at Oct 26, 13:20 UTC. | 524.6Widest at Oct 15, 12:30 UTC. | 17MFrom 7094 ten-minute windows that passed the completeness check. |
MondFx spreads: common questions
What is the typical spread on EURUSD at MondFx?
MondFx's typical EURUSD spread is 0.92 pips, measured on a real trading account rather than taken from the broker. Half the readings were tighter than 0.89 pips, and the tightest we have recorded is 0.30 pips. Each spread is weighted by how long it actually held, not by how many quotes were sent.
How wide do MondFx spreads get on EURUSD?
One reading in twenty was worse than 1.02 pips, and the widest we have recorded is 9.60 pips. Spreads widen at the daily rollover and around news, so the worst figure usually comes from a few minutes of the day rather than from normal trading.
What is the spread on gold (XAUUSD) at MondFx?
MondFx's typical gold spread is 23.9 points. Gold is quoted in points, not pips, so this number cannot be compared directly with a currency pair.
How does Wikilix measure MondFx spreads?
We run a real MetaTrader 5 account at MondFx and read every price the broker sends, every 10 minutes, across 10 instruments — 59.7M quotes so far, since 2026-09-01. Each spread is weighted by how long it held. Ten-minute windows less than 95% complete are excluded. We never place a trade.
How fresh are these MondFx spread figures?
They are read every 10 minutes from a real MetaTrader 5 account and this page was last updated at 2026-10-29 05:59 UTC. Nothing here is typed in by hand or supplied by the broker.
Which MondFx account were these spreads measured on?
A STANDARD account on the Mondtrades-Server server. Spreads differ between account types, so a figure from one account type does not describe another.
Compare spreads across every measured broker← Back to the full MondFx review