You are dealing with Goldman Sachs Futures (Shenzhen), not Qian Kun Futures. The firm warns that any business using one of three names, 乾坤, Qian Kun or QK, is unconnected to Goldman Sachs. Its own client FAQ still uses that name as the company's name.
Why this matters
The firm handed you a test for spotting a fake, then failed it with its own paperwork. Apply the warning to the FAQ and the real document looks like the forgery.
Exhibit 1Every flagged clause gets its own number so you can point at this one. The number does not change, so a link to it keeps working.CriticalHow much this clause can cost you, in our reading. Critical can take your money or your profit. Warning can delay or limit it. Notice is simply worth knowing before you sign.Rarely seenHow ordinary this wording looks next to the contracts we read. This is our reading of the clause, not a count of other brokers.3The figure this clause puts a number on, taken from the broker's own words.NewThis wording was not in the version we read last time. It was added or changed since then.
自2026年3月20日起,高盛及其关联方已不再使用与“乾坤”、“Qian Kun” 、“QK”相关的任何商号;任何使用该等商号的机构或个人均与高盛无关,请留意甄别。
- Worse together with Exhibit 3Read these two clauses together. Each one costs more because the other exists.The document carrying the retired name is the same one carrying trading hours that changed years ago, so neither its name nor its content can be trusted as current.

What traders say about Goldman Sachs Futures
Comments on Goldman Sachs Futures are posted on its profile
Nobody has commented on Goldman Sachs Futures yet. If you have traded with them, your experience helps the next reader decide.
Write the first comment