Wikilix
Wikilix ranking

36 MAS Regulated Brokers

Every broker in the WIKILIX database with a Monetary Authority of Singapore licence on record and no warning flag against it, ordered by WIKILIX score. Six of the 42 MAS records were held back, and the list says why.

Updated September 2026

Thirty-six brokers in the WIKILIX database hold a licence recorded against the Monetary Authority of Singapore and carry no adverse status label. That is the full set rather than a shortlist. Forty-two firms have a MAS record in total, and six are held back by our own status field.

MAS is a tier-1 onshore regulator, so every firm here clears the highest supervisory band we record. The mix is broader than most Singapore broker lists suggest. IG, trading since 1974, and CMC Markets Singapore Pte. Ltd sit alongside Pictet, a Swiss firm whose recorded opening date is 1805, and T. Rowe Price, which at 87.9 holds the highest score on the list.

The 36 at a glance

  • Median WIKILIX score: 61.25, across a range of 45.8 to 87.9.
  • Opened before 2010: 24 of the 36. Sixteen were already trading before 2000.
  • Oldest recorded opening date: 1805. The newest record on the list is dated 2025.
  • Headquartered in Singapore: 7. The licence is Singaporean, the companies mostly are not.
  • Also carry an FCA record: 18, exactly half of the list.
  • MAS is the only regulator recorded: 5, among them OCBC Securities and Phillip Nova.

How we built this list

Two filters, both applied to our own records. The first selects every active broker carrying at least one licence recorded against MAS. The second keeps only those whose WIKILIX status field reads "regulation", the label we use for a firm with no warning attached.

That second filter removed six of the 42. Four carry a suspicious-clone label, one is flagged from a scam report, and one is recorded as operating without regulation. The count is published here rather than the names, because a status label is where a reader's own checks start and not where they finish.

Order is by WIKILIX score, highest first. The score is built from the licences a broker holds, the standing of the regulators behind them, how long the firm has been recorded as trading, and how complete our record of it is. It measures none of the things a demo account would show you, and nobody pays to move up it.

What a MAS licence covers

Dealing in capital markets products from Singapore requires a Capital Markets Services licence, and MAS supervises capital adequacy alongside the handling of client money. The practical value is recourse. A licensed firm sits inside a complaints and enforcement regime that an unlicensed one does not.

Entity names matter more than brand names. Groups license one subsidiary in Singapore and run others elsewhere, so the company on your account agreement may not be the one MAS supervises. Our record for Saxo, for instance, sits with Saxo Bank A/S, a firm our data places in Hong Kong.

Check these before you open an account

  • Look the firm up in the MAS Financial Institutions Directory at mas.gov.sg and match the exact legal entity rather than the brand.
  • Confirm that the entity named in your client agreement is the licensed one.
  • Check which activities the licence actually covers, since one permission does not imply another.
  • Ask which entity holds your money, and in which country it sits.

What this list will not tell you

It carries no spreads and no minimum deposits, because we hold neither. It does not say who accepts clients from your country, since a MAS licence governs what a firm may do in Singapore and not who it may onboard abroad. The leverage figures on these cards are group-wide maximums rather than the cap the Singapore entity applies, which is why no leverage column appears above.

This list is generated from the licence records in the WIKILIX database, so it changes on its own. A broker that gains a MAS entry appears without anyone editing the page, and one whose status label moves from "regulation" to a warning drops out the same way. The count in the copy above is rechecked whenever the page is rebuilt.

Two things are worth doing next. To compare supervisory regimes rather than individual firms, the sibling rankings cover the other tier-1 authorities: FCA regulated brokers, ASIC regulated brokers and NFA regulated brokers. Eighteen of the 36 firms here also carry an FCA record, so that overlap is large and the comparison is a fair one. For the strictest cut across every regulator rather than a single one, tier-1 regulated brokers scoring 70+ puts a score floor on top of the tier.

One limit bears restating. Everything above reflects licences as recorded in our database on the day this page was built, and a database record is not a regulator's register. Confirm any licence with MAS directly before you deposit, and check that the legal entity on your client agreement is the one that holds it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

Answers from the Wikilix research team about this ranking.

Most Popular Questions
Search the MAS Financial Institutions Directory on mas.gov.sg for the exact legal entity, not the brand name. Groups often license one subsidiary in Singapore while operating others elsewhere, so confirm that the company named in your client agreement is the licensed one, and check which regulated activities the permission actually covers before depositing.
It is assembled from the licences a broker holds, the standing of the regulators behind them, how long the firm has been recorded as trading, and how complete our record of it is. On this list it runs from 45.8 to 87.9 with a median of 61.25. It does not measure spreads, execution, withdrawal speed or support, and placement is never paid for.
Their WIKILIX status field carries a warning rather than the clean "regulation" label. Four are recorded as suspicious clones, one is flagged from a scam report and one as operating without regulation. We publish the count rather than the names, because a status label is a prompt for a reader's own verification against the regulator's register, not a finding.
MAS is recorded in our database as a tier-1 onshore authority, the highest supervisory band we classify. Tier-1 onshore regulators generally impose capital requirements, client money rules and a complaints route that offshore registries do not. That describes the regime, not any individual firm. A licence is one input to a decision and not a guarantee about conduct.
This list cannot tell you. It is built from licence records and status labels, and neither field records which countries a broker accepts clients from. A firm may hold a MAS licence and still decline residents of your country, or onboard you through an entirely different group entity licensed elsewhere. Check the broker's own terms and the entity named on the agreement.
No. Only 7 of the 36 are headquartered in Singapore. The rest are domiciled in the United States, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, China, Switzerland, France, Cyprus, Brazil, South Korea and Israel among others. A MAS licence says a firm is supervised for what it does in Singapore. It says nothing about where the company itself is registered.
Thirty-six. Forty-two firms in the database carry a MAS licence record in total, and six of those are excluded because our status field flags them: four with a suspicious-clone label, one from a scam report and one recorded as operating without regulation. The list rebuilds itself, so both numbers move as records change.
Thirty-six brokers in the WIKILIX database hold a Monetary Authority of Singapore licence record and carry no warning flag. They include IG, CMC Markets Singapore Pte. Ltd, OCBC Securities, FOREX.com, eToro and Pictet. The full set appears in the grid below this text, ordered by WIKILIX score, and it is generated from our licence records rather than assembled by hand.
Still Need Help?

Can't find what you're looking for?

Our support team is here to help you get the answers you need.