Wikilix
Wikilix ranking

Offshore Regulated Forex Brokers: 953 on Record

Every broker WIKILIX tracks with a licence from an offshore regulator, from the Seychelles FSA to Vanuatu's VFSC, ranked by score. It shows the ones that also carry a warning flag, because an offshore licence tells you where a firm filed its paperwork, not whether your money is safe.

Updated August 2026

An offshore regulated broker holds a licence from a financial authority in a low-tax, light-touch jurisdiction: the Seychelles FSA, the Mauritius FSC, Vanuatu's VFSC, or the Comoros body behind the MISA mark. WIKILIX tracks 953 firms with at least one licence of that kind, and that count is only half the story. The other half is that 466 of the 953 also carry a warning, from a mild exceeded-scope note to four firms marked outright as scams. An offshore licence tells you where a company filed its paperwork. It does not tell you your deposit is protected.

What puts a broker on this list

Placement here has nothing to do with a broker's head office. It is decided by the authority that issued the licence. A firm run from London can sit on this page if one of its entities is licensed offshore. Ebury, the highest score on the list at 84.8, appears because it pairs a FINTRAC registration with its FCA authorisation. The Hong Kong arm of Interactive Brokers holds eleven separate licences, several of them offshore. Most offshore regulators here sit at tier three or tier four, meaning lighter capital and conduct rules than the FCA or ASIC demand, though a few, such as South Africa's FSCA, are rated tier two.

How many carry a warning, and which

Of the 953, 487 hold a clean regulation status. The remaining 466 carry one of five flags.

Recorded statusBrokers
Clean regulation487
Offshore operation287
No regulation on record70
Suspicious clone66
Exceeded scope39
Scam report4

That is why the score order can read oddly. Straits Financial scores 80.9 and still carries a scam flag, so it ranks high on paper and belongs nowhere near your money. The number beside each broker is a place to start reading its record, not a verdict on it.

The names that are not here

A broker licensed only onshore, holding an FCA, ASIC, or CySEC licence and nothing offshore, will not appear on this page even when it is safer than most firms that do. This list is the mirror image of the FCA register. Many companies show up on both, because they run one entity onshore and another offshore, and the account you open decides which set of rules covers you. If you want the onshore side, the FCA regulated brokers list is the place to start.

What an offshore licence does and does not protect

The trade for accepting an offshore regulator is usually leverage and fewer product limits. Offers on this list run from 1:1 at bank-owned names like Ebury and Bank of Scotland, whose roots reach back to 1695, up to 1:5000 at ACY Securities. Seychelles and Comoros entities such as taurex and CWG Markets commonly reach 1:1000, well above the caps an onshore regulator allows. What you rarely get is a compensation scheme. Lose a dispute with an offshore entity and your recourse is whatever that jurisdiction provides, which is often very little. The list is not all high-leverage newcomers, though. 344 of the 953 firms have traded for fifteen years or more, and old private banks like Pictet, licensed since 1805, sit among them.

Before you fund an offshore account

  • Find the exact legal entity named on your account agreement. One brand often runs both an FCA company and an offshore one, and only the entity you sign with decides your protection.
  • Take the licence number from that agreement and confirm it on the offshore regulator's own register before you deposit.
  • Ask in writing whether any compensation scheme covers your balance. Most offshore licences carry none.
  • Treat leverage of 1:1000 or higher as a sign you are dealing with an offshore entity, since onshore caps sit far below it.
  • If WIKILIX shows a warning flag on the firm, read what the flag says before you send any funds.

This page is rebuilt from the licences WIKILIX holds on record, so a broker that gains or loses an offshore licence joins or leaves it without anyone editing the copy by hand. The status flags are rechecked on the same cycle, which is why the count of flagged firms shifts over time. Treat the figures here as current to today, and confirm any single licence on the issuing regulator's own register before you act on it.

If you came to weigh offshore against onshore protection, read the two sides together. The FCA regulated brokers list covers the UK's tier-one authority, while the FSCA regulated brokers and SCB regulated brokers lists break out two of the specific offshore regulators counted here. Between them you can see how far the same broker's protection changes depending on which entity holds your account.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

Answers from the Wikilix research team about this ranking.

Most Popular Questions
This list cannot tell you that. It is built from where each broker is licensed, not from which countries a firm accepts clients, and WIKILIX does not track client-acceptance rules. A broker can hold an offshore licence and still refuse residents of your country, or the reverse. Always check the firm's own account terms and your local rules before you apply.
South Africa's regulator is the FSCA, and it appears on this list because WIKILIX classes it as an offshore-status authority. Firms such as Avior and Exness hold an FSCA licence among others. Being FSCA-regulated does not mean a broker accepts South African clients, or that its other entities share that oversight, so check the specific entity you would sign with. The FSCA names have their own dedicated list.
Bank of Scotland, which dates to 1695, is the oldest name here, with the private bank Pictet close behind at 1805. The list is not only young high-leverage shops: 344 of the 953 firms have been trading for fifteen years or more. Age is not the same as safety, but a long unbroken record is one signal worth weighing against the warning flags.
Plenty of them run parallel onshore entities. Ebury, the top score at 84.8, holds an FCA authorisation alongside its offshore FINTRAC registration. Interactive Brokers carries eleven licences in total, including the FCA and ASIC, and Pictet pairs Swiss and UK oversight with its offshore permissions. The account you open decides which of those licences actually covers your money.
No. An offshore licence records where a firm is authorised, not how closely it is supervised or whether your deposit is protected. Many offshore regulators run lighter oversight than onshore ones, and most carry no compensation scheme, so a failed dispute can leave you with little recourse. On this list, 466 of the 953 firms carry a warning flag despite holding an offshore licence.
466 of the 953. That breaks down into 287 marked for offshore operation, 70 with no regulation on record, 66 flagged as suspicious clones, 39 that have exceeded their licensed scope, and 4 with scam reports. A flag is WIKILIX's recorded label on the firm, and it is worth reading in full before you treat any score on this page as reassurance.
WIKILIX currently tracks 953 brokers holding at least one offshore licence. Of those, 487 carry a clean regulation status and 466 carry some kind of warning flag. The list is ordered by WIKILIX score, so the highest-scoring names sit at the top, but a high score never cancels out a warning. The total moves as firms gain or lose licences.
It means the broker holds a licence from a regulator based in an offshore jurisdiction, such as the Seychelles FSA, Vanuatu's VFSC, or the MISA authority in the Comoros. WIKILIX tracks 953 such firms. Most of these regulators sit at tier three or four, so their capital and conduct requirements are lighter than those of onshore authorities like the FCA. The label describes where a licence was issued, nothing more.
Still Need Help?

Can't find what you're looking for?

Our support team is here to help you get the answers you need.